Software to plot high quality figures

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around software options for creating high-quality schematic figures in both 2D and 3D, suitable for publication. Participants explore various tools, their capabilities, and limitations in the context of graphical representation in scientific work.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about software commonly used for high-quality schematic figures, referencing a specific example from a research paper.
  • Another participant mentions using gnuplot for producing .eps figures, highlighting its cost-effectiveness as a free tool.
  • A follow-up question asks whether gnuplot can be used to create schematic 3D figures similar to the referenced paper.
  • Suggestions for other software include TikZ for 2D vector drawing, as well as CorelDraw, Inkscape, and Illustrator for both 2D and simple 3D drawings.
  • 3D modeling software options mentioned are Blender, Cinema4D, and 3dsmax, along with specialized graphing tools like SigmaPlot, Origin, SciDavis, and Ensight.
  • One participant notes the limitations of SigmaPlot for 3D surface plots and expresses a desire for better surface visualization capabilities.
  • GIMP is mentioned as a free option for 'pseudo' 3D drawing, alongside Inkscape, which is also noted for its capabilities similar to CorelDraw and Illustrator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present a variety of software options, but there is no consensus on a single preferred tool. Different views on the capabilities and limitations of the mentioned software remain evident throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty regarding the specific capabilities of gnuplot for schematic 3D figures, and there are varying opinions on the effectiveness of different software for specific tasks.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for researchers and practitioners in STEM fields looking for software solutions for creating high-quality figures for publication.

stone
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
What are the softwares that people usually use to create high quality schematic figures (both in 2D and 3D) suitable for publication?
For example Fig 1) in http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1787
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I use gnuplot to produce .eps figures. It's chief benefit is that it is free.
 
Thanks for the reply. I have used it to plot data in both 2D and 3D. But can we draw schematic 3D figures using it, like in the reference quoted in my previous post?
 
any more help would be greatly appreciated!
 
You could as well use: TikZ
- Examples: http://www.texample.net/tikz/examples/tag/3d/
However that is not a drawing program :).

If drawing is more your interest:
2D-Vectordrawing: CorelDraw, Inkscape, Illustrator ( I am pretty sure you could draw the simple 3d-picture of the paper you linked to in any of those as well )
3D-Modelling: Blender, Cinema4D, 3dsmax ...

For graphs there are specialized tools aswell: Origin, SciDavis, Gnuplot
 
thanks a lot!
that was exactly what I was looking for
 
So which of the programs mentioned do you use now?
 
We've used SigmaPlot, particularly for 3D surface plots, but it seems to be rather limited.

I'd like to be able to look through the surfaces.

We've also used Gnuplot, but it has limitations.

There's also Ensight - http://www.ensight.com/ - but it's expensive, and Paraview - http://www.paraview.org/.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have started looking at coreldraw and illustrator.
By the way, some of the 'pseudo' 3d drawing can also be done with gimp, which is free.
 
  • #10
Inkscape is free too and does the same as coreldraw and illustrator
 
  • #11
inkscape looks really good too!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K