Stargazing Solar and Lunar Eclipse - size of moon

AI Thread Summary
During a solar eclipse, the moon's shadow tapers one moon diameter on Earth, while during a lunar eclipse, the Earth's shadow also tapers one moon diameter on the moon. This is due to the relative distances and sizes of the moon and Earth. The Earth's shadow is significantly larger, being 2.5 times wider than the moon. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the tapering of shadows, questioning why the Earth's shadow doesn't taper by an Earth diameter instead. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping the mechanics of eclipses.
samona
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
If during a solar eclipse the moon tapers one moon diameter, wouldn't a lunar eclipse taper one Earth diameter?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
hi samona

what do you mean by tapers one moon diameter ?
you do realize that the moon is a lot closer to the Earth than the sun is ?

Dave
 
I meant the shadow of the moon tapers 1 moon diameter on the Earth during a solar eclipse. My physics book says that the Earth's shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse also tapers 1 moon diameter.

My physics book says that if the moon's shadow tapers 1 moon diameter on the Earth during a solar eclipse, then the Earth's shadow tapers one moon diameter during a lunar eclipse. Therefore, since the Earth's shadow is 2.5 times wider than the moon, if you take into account that the Earth's shadow tapers 1 moon diameter than the Earth is 3.5(2.5 + 1) times larger than the moon.

My confusion is that if the moon's shadow tapers 1 moon diameter, why does the Earth's shadow also taper 1 moon diameter? Wouldn't the Earth's shadow taper one Earth diameter?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
6K
Replies
48
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top