Understanding the Impact of Solar Radiation and Eccentricity on Earth's Climate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the impact of latitude on solar radiation received by two areas, one in America and the other in Asia, both at the same latitude (φ). It concludes that solar radiation is identical for both locations, barring climatic variations such as weather patterns and atmospheric conditions. Additionally, the conversation touches on Earth's eccentricity over the past 750,000 years, suggesting that an increase in eccentricity could influence climate patterns in the next 1,000 years, although specific effects were not detailed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solar radiation principles
  • Knowledge of Earth's eccentricity and its historical data
  • Familiarity with climatic variations and their effects
  • Basic grasp of atmospheric science
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between solar radiation and atmospheric conditions
  • Study the effects of Earth's eccentricity on climate change
  • Examine historical climate data over the past 750,000 years
  • Explore the role of local geography in solar radiation absorption
USEFUL FOR

Climate scientists, meteorologists, environmental researchers, and anyone interested in the effects of solar radiation and Earth's orbital changes on climate patterns.

QuarkDecay
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
I have two questions

(1) If we have two areas, for example one in America and the other on Asia, both with the same latitude φ, which one of the areas will receive more Solar Radiation? Or will it be the same?

(2)
If Earth's eccentricity graph for the past 750k years is this
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/earthchanges/gallery/Climate/eccentricity_graph.gif
based on that, the eccentricity will get increased again in the next 1000 years? And what will that mean for Earth's climate?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
QuarkDecay said:
(1) If we have two areas, for example one in America and the other on Asia, both with the same latitude φ, which one of the areas will receive more Solar Radiation? Or will it be the same?
if both at the same latitude, it will be the same ... is there a reason you thought that it would possibly be otherwise ?
 
davenn said:
if both at the same latitude, it will be the same ... is there a reason you thought that it would possibly be otherwise ?
Barring climactic variations. e.g. the Gobi desert (~42 degrees north latitude) probably gets more sunny days per year than Waverly, Iowa (~42 degrees north latitude).
 
jbriggs444 said:
Barring climactic variations. e.g. the Gobi desert (~42 degrees north latitude) probably gets more sunny days per year than Waverly, Iowa (~42 degrees north latitude).
Solar radiation is same for both. Differences due to weather differences (rain, clouds, etc.).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
mathman said:
Solar radiation is same for both. Differences due to weather differences (rain, clouds, etc.).
That depends on whether you are measuring solar radiation hitting the top of the atmosphere or solar radiation hitting the soil.
 
Moisture content of the local atmosphere ...particulates ... dust , sand if the prevailing wind mostly comes from land areas .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
556
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K