Solar radiation on a horizontal tank

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on estimating the variation of degassing in a horizontal tank of vinyl chloride (VC) due to solar radiation. The tank, located at approximately 51° latitude in Belgium, has a diameter of 3 meters and a length of 10 meters. The user employs the energy balance equation Q = U*deltaT*A to analyze the impact of adding 10 cm of rockwool insulation. Key questions include the appropriateness of convection coefficients and the inclusion of solar radiation in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy balance equations in thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of heat transfer coefficients (hi and he)
  • Familiarity with insulation materials and their thermal properties
  • Basic principles of solar radiation effects on temperature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating solar radiation impact on tank temperature
  • Learn about the thermal properties of rockwool insulation
  • Investigate empirical methods for determining convection coefficients
  • Explore advanced energy balance models for batch processes
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, thermal analysts, and process designers involved in chemical storage and handling, particularly those focused on minimizing evaporation losses in tanks exposed to solar radiation.

eclaisse
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, I'm looking to estimate the variation of degassing on a horizontal tank of VC (vinyl chloride) due to solar radiation.
The feed flow is continuous but the outlet is batch flow. So there is a lot of variation of liquid level in the tank (constant pressure).
To avoid a lot of degassing during big heats, I want to estimate if it is a good idea to put an insulator around the tank.

How can I include a insulating element in my calculation ?
For now, I just have the basic equation of energy balance (convection and solar radiation).

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Let's see what you've done so far.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Welcome to PF.

What is your approximate latitude on Earth ?
Is the tank axis N-S or E-W ?

How much variation is there in ambient air temperature ?
What exactly do you mean by “big heats” ?

What is the maximum capacity of the tank ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: eclaisse
Thanks Baluncore.

Here is some information :
Approximate latitude : 51° (Belgium) and the tank axis is N-S with a diameter of 3m and a length of 10 meters.
I want to see the utility of insulating. During summer we have temperature around 30 degrees celsius.

I try to use the basic equation : Q = U*deltaT*A where U = 1/R = 1/hi + lambda/e + 1/he
Then I compare with the addition of 10 cm rockwool as isolation.
So finally I have Q= [T(outside)-T(inside)]*U*A and I can compare and see the difference between both situation.

I have some questions :
1) I use basic data for hi and he (0.17 et 0.04 m^2.K/W) => Is it ok ?
2) Can I include the solar radiation with this method ?
3) After that, Can I use Q=m*Hvap to estimate my degassing ?

PS : I will upload my calculation in few hours (it will be clearer...)
Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited:
After some research, I do these calculations...
It looks okai. But I still need to include the effect of solar radiation...
Thanks for your time...
1603831890479.png
 
Is the VC at ##\ \ +##14 ##^\circ##C ? or at ##\ \ -##14 ?
 
It is +14°C. It is a calculated value (saturation temperature) from data pressure (2.8bar)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Hello, I update my calcul if someone is interested.
I juste have two questions : My way to estimate my outside surface temperature seems okay ?
And I have a big problem to estimate an average convection coefficient for both situation : (h_out in my first calculation (1/h_out = 0.05 m2.K/W) and h_in in my second (1/h_in = 0.17 m2.K/W). These coefficients change a lot the final result and I am not sure about my values (I just use theoretical value find in literature...).

Thanks a lot.
1606140225181.png
 

Attachments

  • 1606139565575.png
    1606139565575.png
    17.9 KB · Views: 309
The key to this is to look at a worst case scenario, using upper bounds to the inside and outside heat transfer coefficients. That way the calculation should be conservative, and give an upper bound to the evaporation rate. I think your value for the inside heat transfer coefficient looks low. I would use a much higher value, on the order 500. Your outside heat transfer coefficient looks reasonable. Considering that, in the actual situation, the insulation is going to dominate, I guess these values wouldn't matter much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
46K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K