Graduate What is the meaning of ##d\Omega## in solid angle integration?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the integration of solid angles represented by ##d\Omega## in the context of unit vectors. Participants express confusion over the integrals ##\int d\Omega n_{i}n_{j}## and ##\int d\Omega n_{i}n_{j}n_{k}n_{l}##, questioning their validity without further context. There is a suggestion that the result may relate to symmetrized products of Kronecker deltas, particularly noting that ##n_in_j = \delta_{ij}##. Clarification is sought regarding the definition of ##d\Omega## and the nature of unit vectors in these integrals. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for more context to properly evaluate the integrals involving solid angles.
PreposterousUniverse
Messages
31
Reaction score
4
Anyone have any idea how to perform the following two integrals?

##\int d\Omega n_{i}n_{j}## and ##\int d\Omega n_{i}n_{j}n_{k}n_{l}##

where the n is a unit vector.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not if you don't provide some more context. The way it looks now (to me) it's nonsense (##n_in_j = \delta_{ij}## ? )
 
BvU said:
Not if you don't provide some more context. The way it looks now (to me) it's nonsense (##n_in_j = \delta_{ij}## ? )
Actually, I think it should be proportional to some symmetrized product of kronecker deltas. But how can one show that?
 
PreposterousUniverse said:
But how can one show that?
First you have to show what you mean. Isn't a unit vector a constant of the integration ?

Describe ##\;d\Omega##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K