Solid sphere Kinetic Energy problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a solid sphere rolling down an incline, where the height of the incline is to be determined based on the sphere's speed at the bottom. The context includes concepts of conservation of energy and the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy, both linear and rotational.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the conservation of energy equation and the substitution of variables. There is a focus on how to handle the kinetic energy terms without introducing unnecessary variables like mass or radius.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the setup of the energy conservation equation, while others are exploring the implications of substituting variables. There is no explicit consensus, but the discussion is moving towards clarifying the relationships between the terms involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is intended to be solved without knowing the mass or radius of the sphere, which raises questions about how to simplify the equations effectively.

pfunk22
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid sphere is released from rest at the top of an incline of height H and angle 30°. The sphere then rolls down the incline without slipping until it reaches the bottom of the incline, at which point the speed of the center-of-mass of the sphere is found to be 65 cm/s.

What is the value of the height H?

Homework Equations



conservation of energy

KEi + REi + PEi = KEf + REi +PEf

PE=mgh
RE= 1/2*I*w^2
KE= 1/2*m*v^2
where I= 2/5*m*r^2
and v=w*r
w=omega
r=radius
m=mass
v=velocity

The Attempt at a Solution



apparently this is supposed to be solved without mass or the radius of the sphere.
but i can't get all those variables to cancel any help would be awesome.

mgh=1/2*m*(w*r)^2 + 1/2*(2/5mr^2)*(v/r)^2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, how did you set up the conservation of energy?
Secondly, did you use the fourth and fifth relevant equation you listed in order to substitute?
 
As

PEi = KE(linear)f + KE(rotational)f

and ended up with

mgh=1/2*m*(w*r)^2 + 1/2*(2/5mr^2)*(v/r)^2
 
The kinetic energy term lies the problem. You don't want to end up with neither w nor r, so don't replace v!
 
Thank you so much..this was really bugging me...ended up with h= 3.02cm.
 
Seems right to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
909
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K