Identical Hollow and Solid Spheres

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an experiment to distinguish between a hollow sphere and a solid sphere, both of which are identical in appearance and mass. The context is rooted in concepts of rotational dynamics and energy conservation, particularly focusing on how these spheres behave when rolling down an incline.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between moment of inertia and the spheres' velocities as they roll down an incline. There is a focus on how gravitational potential energy is converted into translational and rotational kinetic energy for both types of spheres. Questions arise regarding the implications of differing moments of inertia on their respective speeds and energies.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants questioning and refining their understanding of the principles involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between moment of inertia and energy distribution, but there is no explicit consensus on the final interpretation of the experiment's outcomes.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the experiment's validity hinges on the assumption that the spheres will exhibit different velocities when rolling down the incline, which is essential for the proposed method to work effectively.

cassie123
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two spheres look identical and have the same mass. However, one is hollow and the other is solid. Describe an experiment to determine which is which.

Homework Equations



mgh= ½ m v^2 + ½ I ω^2
where I= 2/3 mr2 for a hollow sphere
I=2/5 mr2 for a solid sphere

The Attempt at a Solution



You could allow the two spheres to roll an identical incline from rest. For both spheres, the gravitational potential energy will be transformed to both rotational kinetic energy and translational potential energy when they reach the base.

Since a solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia, it is less resistant to rotation. More of the original gravitational potential energy will be converted into rotational potential energy for the solid sphere than for the hollow sphere. Thus, the hollow sphere must have more translational kinetic energy and will reach the bottom at a greater translational velocity than the solid sphere will.

Logically I believe that the solid sphere should go faster.. so I am not confident in my logic above.

Could you also argue that the at the moment released from rest the solid sphere will begin to rotate to fall down the incline before the hollow sphere due to the differences in inertia?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cassie123 said:
Since a solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia, it is less resistant to rotation. More of the original gravitational potential energy will be converted into rotational potential energy for the solid sphere than for the hollow sphere.
Think over this again.

If the solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia, will its rotational energy be higher or lower than that of the hollow sphere, if they are rolling at the same rate?

Say sphere A will have a lower rotational energy than sphere B when rolling at the same rate, and both have the same mass. Given the same energy input to both, what can we then say about which one must be rolling faster?
 
andrewkirk said:
Think over this again.

If the solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia, will its rotational energy be higher or lower than that of the hollow sphere, if they are rolling at the same rate?

Say sphere A will have a lower rotational energy than sphere B when rolling at the same rate, and both have the same mass. Given the same energy input to both, what can we then say about which one must be rolling faster?
Based on the equation for the conservation of energy: if a solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia it will then have a lower rotational energy than a hollow sphere. So, the solid sphere must have a higher translational energy and reach the bottom at a higher velocity.
Better?
 
cassie123 said:
Based on the equation for the conservation of energy: if a solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia it will then have a lower rotational energy than a hollow sphere. So, the solid sphere must have a higher translational energy and reach the bottom at a higher velocity.
Better?
If the spheres have the same velocity then the one with the higher moment of inertia will have the higher rotational kinetic energy, right?

But they do not have the same velocity. The proposed experiment only works if their velocities are different. Instead, something else is being held constant.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K