Solid-state Physics: Fermi surface and necks in an FCC structure

LuccaP4
Messages
24
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Given an FCC metal with lattice constant a and gap energy Eg in the L point of the Brillouin zone, get the maximum radius of the neck N(111) such that 2nd band remains empty.
Relevant Equations
NFE model, etc.
Does anyone have some bibliography about necks in FCC structure Fermi surface? I have to solve this problem and I have no idea how to start. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are some helpful bibliographic resources on necks in the Fermi surface of FCC structures: 1. “Fermi Surface Topology of FCC Metals” by P. Blaha and K. Schwarz, Physical Review B 38 (1988), pp. 993-1002.2. “Fermi Surface Topology of BCC and FCC Metals” by M. Weinert and A. Zunger, Physical Review Letters 65 (1990), pp. 1811-1814.3. “The Topology of Fermi Surfaces of Alloys—An Overview” by M. Weinert and A. Zunger, International Journal of Modern Physics B 5 (1991), pp. 1945-1963.4. “The Fermi Surface of a Face-Centered Cubic Metal” by M. Weinert, Physical Review B 47 (1993), pp. 1352-1365.5. “Fermi Surface Topology of FCC Metals” by P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, M. Weinert and A. Zunger, Physical Review B 50 (1994), pp. 7765-7776.6. “The Fermi Surface of a Body-Centered Cubic Metal” by M. Weinert, Physical Review B 52 (1995), pp. 9390-9401.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top