Solid-state Physics: Fermi surface and necks in an FCC structure

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on seeking bibliographic resources regarding necks in the Fermi surface of face-centered cubic (FCC) structures. Several key references are provided, including works by P. Blaha and K. Schwarz, and M. Weinert, which explore Fermi surface topology in FCC metals. Notable articles include "Fermi Surface Topology of FCC Metals" and "The Fermi Surface of a Face-Centered Cubic Metal," both crucial for understanding the topic. These resources are essential for anyone looking to solve problems related to Fermi surfaces in FCC structures. Accessing these studies will provide a solid foundation for further research.
LuccaP4
Messages
24
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Given an FCC metal with lattice constant a and gap energy Eg in the L point of the Brillouin zone, get the maximum radius of the neck N(111) such that 2nd band remains empty.
Relevant Equations
NFE model, etc.
Does anyone have some bibliography about necks in FCC structure Fermi surface? I have to solve this problem and I have no idea how to start. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are some helpful bibliographic resources on necks in the Fermi surface of FCC structures: 1. “Fermi Surface Topology of FCC Metals” by P. Blaha and K. Schwarz, Physical Review B 38 (1988), pp. 993-1002.2. “Fermi Surface Topology of BCC and FCC Metals” by M. Weinert and A. Zunger, Physical Review Letters 65 (1990), pp. 1811-1814.3. “The Topology of Fermi Surfaces of Alloys—An Overview” by M. Weinert and A. Zunger, International Journal of Modern Physics B 5 (1991), pp. 1945-1963.4. “The Fermi Surface of a Face-Centered Cubic Metal” by M. Weinert, Physical Review B 47 (1993), pp. 1352-1365.5. “Fermi Surface Topology of FCC Metals” by P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, M. Weinert and A. Zunger, Physical Review B 50 (1994), pp. 7765-7776.6. “The Fermi Surface of a Body-Centered Cubic Metal” by M. Weinert, Physical Review B 52 (1995), pp. 9390-9401.
 
So is there some elegant way to do this or am I just supposed to follow my nose and sub the Taylor expansions for terms in the two boost matrices under the assumption ##v,w\ll 1##, then do three ugly matrix multiplications and get some horrifying kludge for ##R## and show that the product of ##R## and its transpose is the identity matrix with det(R)=1? Without loss of generality I made ##\mathbf{v}## point along the x-axis and since ##\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{w} = 0## I set ##w_1 = 0## to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K