MHB Sologuitar's question at Yahoo Answers (perpencicular distance)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the formula for the perpendicular distance from the origin to the line represented by the equation y = mx + b. The distance is calculated using the formula d(P_0, r) = |Ax_0 + By_0 + C| / √(A² + B²), where the point P_0 is the origin (0,0) and the line is rewritten in standard form. The calculations show that the distance simplifies to |b| / √(1 + m²). The derivation confirms that the perpendicular distance can be expressed in this manner, providing clarity on the relationship between the line's slope and y-intercept. This mathematical relationship is essential for understanding geometric properties related to lines and distances in coordinate geometry.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Show that the perpendicular distance from the origin to the line y = mx + b is the absolute value of b divided by the square root of the quantity (1 + m^2).

Here is a link to the question:

Perpendicular Distance From (0,0)? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello sologuitar,

In general the distance from the point $P_0=(x_0.y_0)$ to the line $r:Ax+By+C=0$ is

$$d(P_0,r)=\left|\dfrac{Ax_0+By_0+C}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}\right|$$

In our case, $P_0=(0,0)$ and $r:mx-y+b=0$ so,

$$d(P_0,r)=\left|\dfrac{m\cdot 0+(-1)\cdot 0+b}{\sqrt{m^2+(-1)^2}}\right|=\dfrac{\left|b\right|}{\sqrt{1+m^2}}$$
 
Hello sologuitar,

For a derivation of a similar formula to that cited by Fernando Revilla, see this topic:

http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f49/finding-distance-between-point-line-2952/
Mark.
 
Hello, all!

I'll solve this "from scratch".

$\text{Show that the perpendicular distance from the origin to the line }L:\;y \,=\,mx+b$
$\text{is the absolute value of }b\text{ divided by the square root of }(1+m^2).$
Code:
        |
        | *
        |   *  P
        |     o
        |    /  *
        |   /     *
        |  /d       *
        | /           *
        |/              *
    - - * - - - - - - - - -
        |O
The line $L$ has slope $m$.
The line through the origin has slope $\text{-}\frac{1}{m}$.

Point $P$ is the intersection of lines $y \:=\:mx+b$ and $y \:=\:\text{-}\frac{1}{m}x$

. . $mx + b \:=\:\text{-}\dfrac{1}{m}x \quad\Rightarrow\quad mx + \dfrac{1}{m}x \:=\:\text{-}b$

. . $\dfrac{m^2+1}{m}x \:=\:\text{-}b \quad\Rightarrow\quad x \:=\:\dfrac{\text{-}bm}{1+m^2}$

Then $y \:=\:\text{-}\dfrac{1}{m}\left(\dfrac{\text{-}bm}{1+m^2}\right) \quad\Rightarrow\quad y \:=\:\dfrac{b}{1+m^2} $

Point $P$ has coordinates: $\left(\dfrac{\text{-}bm}{1+m^2},\:\dfrac{b}{1+m^2}\right)$Distance $OP$ is: .$d \;=\;\sqrt{\left(\dfrac{\text{-}bm}{1+m^2}\right)^2 + \left(\dfrac{b}{1+m^2}\right)^2} \;=\; \sqrt{\dfrac{b^2m^2}{(1+m^2)^2} + \dfrac{b^2}{(1+m^2)^2}} $

. . . . . . . . . . . $d \;=\;\sqrt{\dfrac{b^2(1+m^2)}{(1+m^2)^2}} \;=\;\sqrt{\dfrac{b^2}{1+m^2}} $

. . Therefore: .$d \;=\;\dfrac{|b|}{\sqrt{1+m^2}} $
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top