Solution of Schrodinger equation for free electron

u_know_who
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi, i am beginning elementary Quantum Mechanics as my course. While studying one question arise in my mind :

In the solution of Schrodinger wave equation there are two parts.

ψ=A*exp(jKx) + B*exp(-jkx). (for confined electron)

But when dealing with free electron the solution is of the following pattern :

ψ = A*exp(jkx) or ψ = B*exp(-jkx).

Can anyone tell me the reason behind that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the power of the exponential describes the direction of the evolution.
here what you have is a solution that either describes a particle traveling in the positive or negative x direction. This is fine, because there is no confining potential, so the solution only travels one way through space. In the previous solution the particle is in some potential, so its motion must be considered in both dircetions.
 
There are ALWAYS 2 linearly independent solutions to the Schrödinger equation, because it's a second order ODE. Which one "survives" and describes quantum states is a matter of rightfully implementing boundary/limit conditions which are necessary to make the hamiltonian or the momentum operator (essentially) self-adjoint.
 
Thank you raymo and dextercioby.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
143
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top