Solution: Open & Closed Subsets in R: Na(E) Nonempty, [a-x,a+x] ⊆ E, E = R

  • Thread starter Thread starter dancergirlie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the properties of a nonempty subset E of R that is both open and closed. It establishes that Na(E), defined as {x > 0 | (a-x, a+x) ⊆ E}, is nonempty and demonstrates that if x ∈ Na(E), then [a-x, a+x] ⊆ E. Furthermore, it proves that if [a-x, a+x] ⊆ E, there exists a y ∈ Na(E) such that y > x, and concludes by showing that Na(E) is unbounded above, ultimately leading to the conclusion that E = R.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of open and closed sets in topology
  • Familiarity with the real number system R
  • Knowledge of set notation and properties
  • Basic principles of mathematical proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of open and closed sets in topology
  • Learn about connected spaces and their implications in real analysis
  • Explore the concept of neighborhoods in the context of metric spaces
  • Review proof techniques, particularly those involving contradiction and set theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis and topology, as well as educators looking for insights into teaching concepts of open and closed sets.

dancergirlie
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let E be a nonempty subset of R, and assume that E is both open
and closed. Since E is nonempty there is an element a \in E. De note the set
Na(E) = {x > 0|(a-x, a+x) \subsetE}

(a) Explain why Na(E) is nonempty.
(b) Prove that if x \in Na(E) then [a-x, a+x] \subset E.
(c) Prove that if [a-x; a+x] \subset E, then there is a y \in Na(E) satisfying y > x.
(d) Show that Na(E) is not bounded above (argue by contradiction).
(e) Prove that E = R.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



a) I don't know if I can just say for (a-x)<(a+x) there has to be an y\inR so that (a-x)<y<(a+x).

b)
I was thinking, since x is in Na(E) that would mean that x\in E and since a and x are both in E, by definition of a set, that would mean that
a-x \in E, and
a+x \in E
and since (a-x, a+x) is contained in E and now (a-x) and (a+x) are in E, that would mean:
[a-x,a+x] \subset E

The rest I'm not too sure about, any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (e) you can take B = R-E and it is also open and closed. What can you say about A union B and A intersection B? Remembering that the Reals are a connected space, what can you say about B?

Also it seems that you haven't used the open and closed properties. Remember the definition of an open set, involving neighborhoods, and that the complement of an open set is closed and vice versa.
 
Last edited:
how would I incorporate the properties and which ones would it work best on? I can't really see how they would work on part a
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K