Graduate Solution?: Quintic Equation from Physical System

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the quintic equation $X^{5}+ C X - C =0$, which arises from a physical model in natural ventilation. The user, Daniel, seeks an explicit analytical solution for the roots in terms of the constant C, constrained to real values between 0 and 1. Responses indicate that while an explicit formula may not exist, numerical methods such as Newton's method are effective for finding roots, especially for varying values of C. The conversation also references WolframAlpha for computational insights and discusses the potential use of elliptic functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quintic equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with Newton's method for root-finding
  • Basic knowledge of polynomial functions and their behavior
  • Experience with numerical analysis tools, such as WolframAlpha
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Newton's method for solving polynomial equations
  • Explore elliptic functions and their role in solving quintic equations
  • Learn how to use WolframAlpha for polynomial root analysis
  • Investigate the implications of Descartes' rule of signs in polynomial root finding
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with polynomial equations in physical systems, particularly those interested in numerical methods for root finding and the analysis of quintic functions.

danielFiuza
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
First time in this forum, so greetings to everyone!

I am currently working with some physical models in the field of natural ventilation and I came across the following 5th order polynomial equation (quintic function):

$X^{5}+ C X - C =0$

This is the steady state solution of a physical system of coupled ODEs. And I am interested in finding a explicit relationship for X = f(), (the roots in terms of C), possibly analytically. The values of X (that makes physical sense) needs to be real and between 0 and 1. Additionally, C is a constant (a time scale of my system), which need to be larger or equal than 0 (and to infinity).

I can plot this equation numerically, but I was wondering if I can obtain a explicit/analytical solution of this equation for C>=0 and X[0 1]. I have been reading a little bit about quintic functions, and how some of them can be solved (this one seems to be in a similar way as Quintics in Bring–Jerrard form).

If anyone could give me some insight about this equations or if it is possible an explicit solution for the root with the constrains C>=0 and X[0 1], I would be extremely grateful!

Thanks in advance,

Daniel

EDIT: improved explanation of one line.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe it might be possible to solve quintic equations using things like elliptic functions, but I expect it would be a ton of work, would not provide any extra insight, and at the end of the day would probably require at least as much computation as just solving the problem numerically to begin with.

Before jumping to numerics, we can learn a little about the real roots with very little work. Since the ##C=0## case is trivial, I will assume ##C>0##. From Descarte's rule of signs there is only 1 real positive root. If we let ##p(x) = x^5 + C x - C##, then it is clear that ##p(0) = -C## and ##p(1) = 1##, and since ##p## is continuous this tells us the real root is always between 0 and 1. So your constraint always holds.

Newton's method should converge pretty quickly as long as your initial guess is reasonable. For ##C<<1## we expect the root to be small, so ##p(x) \approx x^5 - C## and the root is approximately ##C^{1/5}##. For ##C>>1## we have ##p(x) \approx C x - C## and the root is approximately ##1##. So for an initial guess for Newton's method I would try ##x_0 = C^{1/5}/(1 + C^{1/5})##. I suggest you use Newton's method (or any other root-finding method) to find the root for values of ##C## that span the domain you care about and plot the curve. I suspect it is pretty well behaved.

jason
 
  • Like
Likes danielFiuza and berkeman
danielFiuza said:
$$X^{5}+ C X - C =0$$

.
Latex needs a double $ sign.
 
fresh_42 said:
I don't think there is an analytic formula, especially with a unknown value of ##c##.
Here are some results from WolframAlpha for it: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x^5+cx-c=0

Why would you not consider the Mathematica solution:

HypergeometricPFQ[{1/5, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5}, {1/2, 3/4, 5/4}, -3125/(256 c)]

to be an "analytic" solution.
 
  • Like
Likes jasonRF
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K