MHB Solutions of an inequality (1-√(1-4x^2)/x < 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the inequality (1 - √(1 - 4x²))/x < 3. Participants clarify that x must be in the range of -1/2 to 1/2 due to the square root condition. The correct approach involves solving the associated equation √(1 - 4x²)/x = 3, leading to the quadratic equation 13x² - 6x = 0, which has roots at x = 0 and x = 6/13. The importance of checking intervals around these roots and the discontinuity at x = 0 is emphasized to determine where the function is less than 3. The conversation highlights the need for careful handling of terms during the manipulation of the inequality.
Vali
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I need to find the solutions of the following inequation:
(1-sqrt(1-4x^2)/x < 3
I put the conditions x different from 0 and 1-4x^2>=0 and I got [-1/2,0)U(0,1/2] which is the right answer but I'm confuse because I usually subtract 3 to get (1-sqrt(1-4x^2)/x - 3 < 0 then, after I made some work and I got a fraction, I find the variation of each function (from numerator and denominator) and in the final I find the sign of f(x) which should be negative in our case and like this I find the solutions, but I didn;t get the same result.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Vali said:
I need to find the solutions of the following inequation:
(1-sqrt(1-4x^2)/x < 3
I put the conditions x different from 0 and 1-4x^2>=0 and I got [-1/2,0)U(0,1/2] which is the right answer but I'm confuse because I usually subtract 3 to get (1-sqrt(1-4x^2)/x - 3 < 0 then, after I made some work and I got a fraction, I find the variation of each function (from numerator and denominator) and in the final I find the sign of f(x) which should be negative in our case and like this I find the solutions, but I didn;t get the same result.
You are missing a parenthesis. Do you mean (1- sqrt(1- 4x^2))/x< 3?

First, because of the \sqrt{1- 4x^2}, x must lie between -1/2 and 1/2.

In my opinion the best way to handle such an inequality is to first solve the associated equation, \frac{\sqrt{1- 4x^2}}{x}= 3. To solve that multiply both sides by x to get \sqrt{1- 4x^2}= 3x and square both sides to get 1- 4x^2= 9x^2. Then 13x^2= 1, x= \pm\sqrt{1/13}.

The point of that is that in order that the value of a function change from "< 3" to "> 3" it must either be "= 3" or be discontinuous. This function is 3 at x=\pm\sqrt{1/13} and, because of the division by 3, is discontinuous at x= 0.

Now, check one value in each interval, -1/2\le x\le -\sqrt{1/13}, -\sqrt{1/13}\le x&lt; 0, 0&lt; x\le \sqrt{1/13}, and \sqrt{1/13}\le x\le 1/2 to determine in which interval the value is less than 3 and in which the value greater than 3.
 
Thank you for the help!
I understood, but I have one question.Why the associated equation is sqrt(1-4x^2)/x=3 and not (1-sqrt(1-4x^2))/x=3 ? Why you cancel that "1" ?
 
I just mistakenly dropped it! Yes, the associated equation should be \frac{1- \sqrt{1- x^2}}{x}= 3 so that 1- \sqrt{1- 4x^2}= 3x. Then \sqrt{1- 4x^2}= 1- 3x and, squaring both sides, 1- 4x^2= 9x^2- 6x+ 1. That gives us the quadratic equation 13x^2- 6x= x(13x- 6)= 0 which has roots 0 and -6/13.
 
Country Boy said:
That gives us the quadratic equation 13x^2- 6x= x(13x- 6)= 0
which has roots 0 and -6/13.
0 and 6/13 :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top