Solutions of wave equation but not Maxwell equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between solutions of the wave equation and Maxwell's equations in the absence of charges and currents. It establishes that a vector field ##\bf{E}## satisfying both the wave equation $$\nabla^2 \bf{E}=\mu \epsilon \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial t^2}$$ and Maxwell's equations can be combined with another vector field ##\bf{E'}##, which is irrotational (i.e., ##\nabla \times \bf{E'}=0##) and divergence-free (i.e., ##\nabla \cdot \bf{E}=0##), to still satisfy the wave equation. The discussion also highlights the importance of the divergence-free condition for ensuring that the k-vector is perpendicular to the electric field vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations in electromagnetism.
  • Familiarity with wave equations and their mathematical formulations.
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, specifically divergence and curl operations.
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate mathematical expressions involving partial derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of divergence-free fields in electromagnetism.
  • Learn about the mathematical properties of irrotational vector fields.
  • Explore the derivation and applications of the wave equation in different media.
  • Investigate the relationship between electric fields and k-vectors in wave propagation.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism and wave propagation, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of Maxwell's equations and their solutions.

crick
Messages
39
Reaction score
4
Maxwell equation in absence of charges and currents are

$$\nabla \cdot \bf{E} = 0 \\ \nabla\cdot B=0 \\ \nabla \times E=-\frac{\partial B}{\partial t} \\\nabla \times B=\mu \epsilon \frac{\partial E}{\partial t}$$

Wave equation is $$\nabla ^2 \bf{E}=\mu \epsilon \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial t^2}\tag{1}$$

How can I prove that, given a solution ##\bf{E}## that satisfies both Maxwell equations and ##(1)##, then the vector ##\bf{E+E'}## where ##\bf{}{}E'## is a vector such that ##\nabla \times \bf{}{}E'=0## (and ##\nabla \cdot E \bf{}##) is a solution of ##(1)##?

As I found explained here https://www.photonics.ethz.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Courses/EM_FieldsAndWaves/WaveEquation.pdf,

Although the field $E(r, t)$ fulfills the wave equation it is not yet a rigorous solution of Maxwell’s equations. We still have to require that the fields are divergence free, i.e. $∇·E(r, t) = 0$. This condition restricts the k-vector to directions perpendicular to the electric field vector $(k·E_0 = 0)$.

Can anyone provide a proof of the fact that a non divergence free (but irrotational) vector can be solution of wave equation without being solution of maxwell equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
crick said:
Maxwell equation in absence of charges and currents are

$$\nabla \cdot \bf{E} = 0 \\ \nabla\cdot B=0 \\ \nabla \times E=-\frac{\partial B}{\partial t} \\\nabla \times B=\mu \epsilon \frac{\partial E}{\partial t}$$

Wave equation is $$\nabla ^2 \bf{E}=\mu \epsilon \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial t^2}\tag{1}$$

How can I prove that, given a solution ##\bf{E}## that satisfies both Maxwell equations and ##(1)##, then the vector ##\bf{E+E'}## where ##\bf{}{}E'## is a vector such that ##\nabla \times \bf{}{}E'=0## (and ##\nabla \cdot E \bf{}##) is a solution of ##(1)##?

As I found explained here https://www.photonics.ethz.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Courses/EM_FieldsAndWaves/WaveEquation.pdf,



Can anyone provide a proof of the fact that a non divergence free (but irrotational) vector can be solution of wave equation without being solution of maxwell equation?

Hi crick,

Perhaps we can use the following calculation rule?
$$\nabla\times(\nabla\times f)=\nabla(\nabla\cdot f)-\nabla^2 f$$

And how about:
$$E=(x^2+c^2t^2)\mathbf{\hat x}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
606
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
667
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
685
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
681
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
850