Solutions to Bessel's equation with Wolfram

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Joppy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the solutions to Bessel's equation, specifically addressing the form of the solution for non-integer orders, denoted as $\nu$. The established solution is $y(x) = c_1 J_{\nu} + c_2 Y_{\nu}$, where $Y_{\nu}$ represents Bessel's function of the second kind. This form is applicable for all values of $\nu$, including non-integers, contradicting the misconception that $Y_{\nu}$ only arises for integer $\nu$. The conversation clarifies that both $J_{\nu}$ and $Y_{\nu}$ are necessary for a complete solution in the context of Bessel's equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bessel's equation and its general solutions
  • Familiarity with Bessel functions, specifically $J_{\nu}$ and $Y_{\nu}$
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations, particularly second-order equations
  • Mathematical notation related to functions and constants in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Bessel functions in mathematical physics
  • Explore the derivation of Bessel's equation and its solutions
  • Learn about the significance of singular solutions in differential equations
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving Bessel's equation using software like Wolfram Alpha
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students interested in differential equations, particularly those studying wave phenomena and vibrations where Bessel functions are applicable.

Joppy
MHB
Messages
282
Reaction score
22
Hi

Why does Wolfram find the solution of Bessels equation with non-integer $\nu$ to be of the form $y = c_1 J_\nu + c_2 Y_\nu$. I thought Bessels function of the second kind only arose in situations were $\nu$ is an integer. What's going on here? Thanks :).

As an example, see here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know where you got that idea. Bessel's equation, for any \nu, is a second order differential equation so has two independent solutions, one of which is singular at the origin. That one is the "Bessel's function of the second kind".
 
HallsofIvy said:
I don't know where you got that idea.

I don't know where you got the idea that your response constitutes any sort of answer.

It stated in numerous texts that the general solution to Bessels equation with non-integer $\nu$ is given by, $y(x) = c_1 J_{\nu} + c_2 J_{-\nu}$, two linearly independent solutions.

Bessel's equation, for any \nu, is a second order differential equation so has two independent solutions, one of which is singular at the origin. That one is the "Bessel's function of the second kind".

When Bessels function of the second kind is introduced we then say that a general solution for all x>0 is $y(x) = c_1 J_{\nu} + c_2 Y_{\nu}$, as you have said. I realize that $Y_{\nu}$ includes both Bessels function of the first kind of order $\nu$ and $\-nu$, but this doesn't make them equivalent.

So, again, my question. Why, in the link in the OP, is the solution not of the form $y(x) = c_1 J_{\nu} + c_2 J_{-\nu}$, since $\nu$ is non-integer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
530
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K