Solutions to Schrodinger's Wave Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nothing000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the one-dimensional time-dependent Schrödinger's wave equation, specifically examining the properties of solutions to this equation. The original poster seeks to understand the implications of linearity and superposition in the context of two given solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of linearity in solutions to partial differential equations and question whether the sum of two solutions is also a solution. There is a focus on the need for a proof rather than specific solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of the Schrödinger equation and the concept of superposition. Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the equation itself and its components, while others are seeking further guidance on how to approach the proof of linearity.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing inquiry into the full form of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and its implications for the problem at hand. Participants are also navigating the boundaries of what is required for the homework assignment, particularly in terms of proof versus specific solution derivation.

Nothing000
Messages
403
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Assume that [tex]\psi_{1}(x,t)[/tex] and [tex]\psi_{2}(x,t)[/tex] are solutions of the one-dimensional time-dependent Schrödinger's wave equations.
(a) Show that [tex]\psi_{1} + \psi_{2}[/tex] is a solution.

(b) Is [tex]\psi_{1} \cdot \psi_{2}[/tex] a solution of the Schrödinger's equation in general?



Homework Equations


Is this the "One-Dimensional Time-Dependent Schrödinger's Wave Equation":
[tex]\eta = \imath \hbar \cdot \frac{1}{\phi(t)} \cdot \frac{\partial \phi(t)}{ \partial t}[/tex]

If so, it says in my book that the solution is [tex]\phi(t) = e^{- \imath (\frac{E}{\hbar})t[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


I have a feeling that all I have to do is show that these solutions are linear, then use the superposition technique.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your relevant equation is *half* of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in the special case that there is no potential energy, and *after* separation of variables has been performed in x and t. (The other half involves x, and not t.)

Yes, linearity and superposition is the key point.
 
So I don't really even need to know what the solutions are? All I need to do is some sort of "proof" that the sum of the two solutions to the linear P.D.E. is also a solution?

If that is the case, do you think you could help me get started with working that out?
 
Could you please write the full time-dependent Schrödinger equation?
 
Anyone?
 
In one space dimension, the full time-dependent Schrödinger equation is

[tex]i\hbar{\partial\over\partial t}\psi(x,t) = \left[-{\hbar^2\over2m}{\partial^2\over\partial x^2}+V(x)\right]\psi(x,t)[/tex]

Edit: the derivative on the right-hand side is wrt x, now fixed and correct.
 
Last edited:
So how do I show that [tex]\psi_{1}(x,t)[/tex] and [tex]\psi_{2}(x,t)[/tex] have linearity and superposition can be used to create a third solution?
 
You know that [tex]\psi_{1}(x,t)[/tex] and [tex]\psi_{2}(x,t)[/tex] obey this equation. You want to show that [tex]\psi_{1}(x,t) + \psi_{2}(x,t)[/tex] does as well. So, plug [tex]\psi_{1}(x,t) + \psi_{2}(x,t)[/tex] into the equation. Can you used what you know to show that the result is true?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K