Solve 2^x=x^2+7 | Find x Without Differentiation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harmony
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation 2^x = x^2 + 7 has a solution at x = 5. The discussion emphasizes the effectiveness of graphical methods and substitution techniques for solving this transcendental equation. Users are encouraged to utilize the Newton's method for root-finding, specifically through the provided online tool from Shodor. The substitution method is also highlighted, demonstrating that values from x = 1 to x = 5 progressively approach the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential and polynomial equations
  • Familiarity with graphical methods for solving equations
  • Knowledge of Newton's method for root-finding
  • Basic logarithmic properties and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the graphical method for solving transcendental equations
  • Learn how to implement Newton's method for root-finding in Python
  • Study the properties of logarithms and their applications in solving equations
  • Investigate other transcendental equations and their solution techniques
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying algebra and calculus, and anyone interested in solving transcendental equations without differentiation.

Harmony
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
2^x=x^2+7
Find x.

The answer is 5. I have tried substituting 2^x=a, but that doesn't help. Is differentiation method required here? If not, how should I approach the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation is awfully transcendetal. My advice is to find the solution by a graphical method.

[tex]x=\frac{1}{\ln 2}\ln\left(x^{2}+7\right)[/tex]

Daniel.
 
2^x = x^2 + 7
2^x - x^2 - 7 = 0

Now use the http://www.shodor.org/UNChem/math/Newton/index.html" to find root(s) of f(x) = 0

If the eqn, 2^x=x^2+7, looks simple enough you could try simple substitution.

x=1: 2 = 1 + 7 -- nope, lhs too small
x=2: 4 = 4 + 7 -- nope, lhs too small
x=3: 8 = 9 + 7 -- nope, lhs too small
x=4: 16 = 16 + 7 -- nope, lhs too small
x=5: 32 = 25 + 7 -- yep, lhs = rhs

If the above substitution method didn't work, and you went from lhs too small to rhs too large, with a value of x = xo, say, then you could try the http://www.shodor.org/UNChem/math/Newton/index.html" with xo as your first approximation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K