Solve 2D Elastic Collision: Prove 90° Angle Between Objects

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a two-dimensional elastic collision between two objects of equal mass, where one object is initially at rest. The objective is to demonstrate that the angle between their velocities after the collision is 90 degrees.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy, attempting to set up equations based on the components of velocity. There are attempts to manipulate these equations to find relationships between angles and velocities after the collision.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified errors in their previous approaches and are seeking clarification on the correct application of kinetic energy and momentum principles. There is an ongoing exploration of how to properly relate the components of velocity in the context of an elastic collision.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the correct interpretation of kinetic energy and momentum equations, particularly regarding the treatment of vector components and the implications of orthogonality in the context of the collision.

ambsop
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Object 1 with velocity v hits object 2, of same mass at velocity 2. Prove that the angle between them after the collision is equal to 90 degrees.


Homework Equations


PE inital = PE final
KE initial = KE final


The Attempt at a Solution



P x component
m1 x v1 + 0 = (m1)(v'1)(costheta1) + (m1)(v'2)(costheta2)

p y comp
0 = (m1)(v'1)(sintheta1) + (m1)(v'2)(sintheta2)

kinetic E equation simplifies to
v1 - v2 = v'2 - v'1

I can't figure out how to combine the three to a point where they simplify.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ambsop said:
kinetic E equation simplifies to
v1 - v2 = v'2 - v'1
If I recall correctly, this relationship only holds for elastic collisions in one dimension.

Try squaring each of the two equations you have and then add them together. Then use the fact that the collision is elastic to eliminate some of the terms.
 
okay, so i tried that and I'm still stuck. Here's what I did: (' meaning after collision)

V1x = v1'cos1 + v2'cos2
V1y = v1'sin1 + v2'sin2

V^2 = V1x^2 + V2y^2
(v1'cos1)^2 + 2v1'v2'cos1cos2 + (v2'cos2)^2 + (v1'sin1)^2 + 2v1'v2'sin1sin2 + (v2'sin2)^2

From kinetic energy:
V^2 = v1'^2 + v2'^2
(v1' = v1'cos1 + v1'sin1
v2' = v2'cos2 + v2sin2)
(v1'cos1)^2 + 2v1v1cos1sin1 + (v1sin1)^2 + (v2cos2)^2 + 2v2v2cos2sin2 + (v2sin2)^2

Setting the momentum equation to the kinetic energy equation and simplifying leaves me with:

v1v2(cos1cos2 + sin1sin2) = v1v1cos1sin1 + v2v2cos2sin2

using trig identities:
1. sinusinv = 1/2[cos(u-v) - cos(u+v)] and
2. cosucosv = 1/2[cos(u-v) + cos (u+v)] results in the left side of the equation simplifying to:
cos(1-2)v1v2 = v1v1cos1sin1 + v2v2cos2sin2

i don't know what to do with this equation now.
 
You're not squaring the velocities correctly. There is no cross term with the x and y components because they are orthogonal. In other words,
[tex]\vec{v} = v\cos\theta\,\hat{i} + v\sin\theta\,\hat{j},[/tex] so when you square this vector, you get
[tex]v^2 = \vec{v}\cdot\vec{v} = (v \cos\theta)^2 + (v\sin\theta)^2.[/tex] You don't get [itex](v\cos\theta+v\sin \theta)^2[/itex].
 
I'm confused. I think I'm over complicating this problem. So that equation you just gave me, comes from the kinetic energy equation right? But is it v1cos1 or v2cos2? And where does momentum play into this? Do I really need to break it up into the x and y components?
 
What I'm saying is this part is wrong:
ambsop said:
From kinetic energy:
V^2 = v1'^2 + v2'^2
(v1' = v1'cos1 + v1'sin1
v2' = v2'cos2 + v2sin2)
If an object is moving 3 m/s in the x-direction and 4 m/s in the y-direction, its speed isn't 8 m/s. It's 5 m/s. You don't simply (scalar) add the individual components to get the speed.

Therefore, the following is wrong
(v1'cos1)^2 + 2v1v1cos1sin1 + (v1sin1)^2 + (v2cos2)^2 + 2v2v2cos2sin2 + (v2sin2)^2
The cross terms shouldn't be there.
 
I now understand why my first approach was wrong, but I don't know how to start this problem.
 
You're almost there. Just fix your mistake.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K