MHB Solve Absolute Value Equation |(2x + 1)|/|(3x + 4)| = 1

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Solve the absolute value equation.

|(2x + 1)|/|(3x + 4)| = 1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Solve the absolute value equation.

|(2x + 1)|/|(3x + 4)| = 1
Hint: What's the first thing you do to solve the equation [math]\dfrac{5}{x} = 1[/math] ?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Hint: What's the first thing you do to solve the equation [math]\dfrac{5}{x} = 1[/math] ?

-Dan

In the equation 5/x = 1, the first thing we do is multiply both sides of the equation by x to remove the fraction on the left side.

Are you saying that I must multiply both sides of the posted question by | x |?
 
RTCNTC said:
In the equation 5/x = 1, the first thing we do is multiply both sides of the equation by x to remove the fraction on the left side.

Are you saying that I must multiply both sides of the posted question by | x |?

Will that allow you to divide out the denominator on the LHS?
 
Someone suggested for me to square both sides.

After doing so, I got

4x^2 + 4x + 1 = 9x^2 + 24x + 16
0 = 5x^2 + 20x + 15
0 = x^2 + 4x + 3

x = -3, -1
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top