Solve Algebraic Equation: ax^(n-1) - x + 1 - a = 0

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wuberdall
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the algebraic equation ax^(n-1) - x + 1 - a = 0, specifically exploring solutions beyond the trivial solution x = 1. A proposed non-trivial solution is x = 1 - (2a(n-1)-2)/(a(n-2)(n-1)). Participants suggest simplifying the equation, with one user recommending dividing the original equation by (x-1) to derive a lower power equation, particularly for n = 3. The conversation highlights the complexity of finding alternative solutions in the context of percolation theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic equations and their solutions
  • Familiarity with percolation theory concepts
  • Knowledge of polynomial division techniques
  • Experience with specific values of parameters in algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research polynomial division methods for simplifying algebraic equations
  • Explore the implications of percolation theory on algebraic solutions
  • Study specific cases of the equation for different values of n, particularly n = 3
  • Investigate the derivation and verification of non-trivial solutions in algebraic equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying algebra and percolation theory, and anyone interested in solving complex algebraic equations.

Wuberdall
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm currently studying percolation theory and here I'm stuck on the this "simple" algebraic equation
ax^{n-1} - x +1 - a = 0
clearly, the trivial solution x = 1 solves it. But I'm told that
x = 1 - \frac{2a(n-1)-2}{a(n-2)(n-1)}
is another solution. This makes we wonder, if the equation can be put into a simpler form (e.g. quadratic or cubic) — even though I haven't succeed to.

Can any of you help ??

Thaks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think that the statement is true. With a=4, n=4, I get x=1/12 and f(1/12) = -1331/432
 
Wuberdall said:
clearly, the trivial solution x = 1 solves it.

Then you can obtain an equation in a lower power of x by dividing the original equation by (x-1). Try that for a particular case like n = 3.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K