MHB Solve Box Cost Minimization w/ Lagrange Multipliers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Lagrange multiplier method to minimize the total cost of manufacturing an open-top box with a volume of 6 ft³. The cost function is defined as C(x,y,z) = 3xz + yz + 2xy, with constraints based on the box's volume. Through the application of Lagrange multipliers, the dimensions that minimize cost are found to be x = 1 ft, y = 3 ft, and z = 2 ft. The minimum cost calculated for these dimensions is $18. The solution demonstrates the effectiveness of the Lagrange multiplier method in optimizing manufacturing costs.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Please help!? lagrange multiplier method?


Find the dimensions of the box which will minimize the TOTAL COST of manufacturing the following open top box of volume 6ft^3?

Solve by the lagrange multiplier method!
Bottom panel costs $3/ft^2
side panel cost $.50/ft^2
Front and back panels cost $1/ft^2

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello acacia,

I would orient the box such that the width is $x$, the height is $y$ and the length is $z$. Hence, the bottom panel has area $xz$, the side panels have a total area of $2yz$ and the front and back panels have a combined area of $2xy$.

Let all linear measures be given in feet.

Thus, our objective function, the function we wish to minimize is the cost function in dollars, which is given by:

$$C(x,y,z)=3xz+yz+2xy$$

Subject to the constraint on the volume:

$$g(x,y,z)=xyz-6=0$$

Using Lagrange multipliers, we obtain:

$$3z+2y=\lambda(yz)$$

$$z+2x=\lambda(xz)$$

$$3x+y=\lambda(xy)$$

Solving for $\lambda$, the first two equations imply:

$$\frac{2y+3z}{yz}=\frac{2x+z}{xz}$$

Cross-multiplying, we obtain:

$$2xyz+3xz^2=2xyz+yz^2$$

$$3xz^2=yz^2$$

Since the constraint requires $$0<z$$, we may write:

$$3x=y$$

In like manner the first and third equations above imply:

$$\frac{2y+3z}{yz}=\frac{3x+y}{xy}$$

Cross-multiplying, we obtain:

$$2xy^2+3xyz=3xyz+y^2z$$

$$2x=z$$

Substituting for $y$ and $z$ into the constraint, we obtain:

$$x(3x)(2x)=6$$

$$x^3=1$$

$$x=1\implies y=3,\,z=2$$

Observing that:

$$C(1,3,2)=3(1)(2)+(3)(2)+2(1)(3)=18$$

and another constraint value such as $(x,y,z)=(1,2,3)$ yields:

$$C(1,2,3)=3(1)(3)+(2)(3)+2(1)(2)=19$$

We may then conclude:

$$C_{\min}=C(1,3,2)=18$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top