MHB Solve Circle Radius Given Trapezoid Height & Length

AI Thread Summary
Determining the radius of a circle given the height and length of a trapezoid is complex and requires additional information. The discussion highlights the use of right-angled triangles and Pythagorean theorem to derive equations relating the radius and lengths. By manipulating these equations, a quadratic formula for the radius can be established in terms of the trapezoid's dimensions. The configuration can be clarified if a horizontal line is tangential to the circle, which helps in solving for the unknowns. The participants express gratitude for the assistance and encouragement in tackling the problem.
Jeppe1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't know if this can be calculated.
I have tried for hours and days to isolate/calculate the radius and angles of the circle in order to be able to calculate length 1. I have tried using cos/sin-relation formulas and triangle formas - but Iam stuck. Any hints would be greatly appreciated. The task is one i have put on my self for cutting out a wooden plate. I have made the cut - but by approximation :-)

View attachment 3333
 

Attachments

  • Can this be calculated.JPG
    Can this be calculated.JPG
    28.1 KB · Views: 115
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Jeppe,

Unfortunately, without more information, the four unknowns cannot be determined.
 
Draw horizontal lines through the points where the lines $h_1$ and $h_2$ meet the circle. That will give you a pair of right-angled triangles. You can then use Pythagoras to get the equations $$(r-h_1)^2 + l_1^2 = r^2,$$ $$(r-h_2)^2 + (l_1+l_2)^2 = r^2.$$ After a bit of algebra (expanding those brackets), the equations reduce to $$h_1^2 - 2rh_1 + l_1^2 = 0,\qquad (*)$$ $$h_2^2 - 2rh_2 + l_1^2 + 2l_1l_2 + l_2^2.$$ Subtract the first of those equations from the second: $$h_2^2 - h_1^2 - 2r(h_2 - h_1) + 2l_1l_2 + l_2^2 = 0.$$ Solve that for $l_1$: $$l_1 = \frac{(h_2 - h_1)(2r - h_1 - h_2) - l_2^2}{2l_2}.$$ Substitute that expression for $l_1$ into the equation labelled (*) and you will have a quadratic equation (admittedly quite a messy one) for $r$ in terms of $h_1$, $h_2$ and $l_2$.

Edit (@Euge): I am assuming that the horizontal blue line is meant to be tangential to the circle. That should determine the configuration, shouldn't it?
 
Opalg said:
Edit (@Euge): I am assuming that the horizontal blue line is meant to be tangential to the circle. That should determine the configuration, shouldn't it?

Yes, in that case it does. We would then have $\tan \phi_1 = \frac{\ell_1}{r-h_1}$ and $\tan (\phi_1 + \phi_2) = \frac{\ell_1 + \ell_2}{r-h_2}$, so then

$$\tan \phi_2 = \frac{\tan (\phi_1 + \phi_2) - \tan \phi_1}{1 + \tan (\phi_1 + \phi_2) \tan \phi_1} = \frac{(r - h_2)\ell_1 - (r - h_1)(\ell_1 + \ell_2)}{(r - h_1)(r - h_2) + \ell_1(\ell_1 + \ell_2)}.$$

Since $r$ and $\ell_1$ have been determined, it now follows that the entire configuration is determined.
 
Wow - that was fast ! - I will get working on the quadratic!
Thanks and thanks again! - best forum and page ever :)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top