Solve DE: y' + 2ty = 5t Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter luitzen
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation y' + 2ty = 5t, which falls under the subject area of differential equations. Participants explore various methods for finding the general and particular solutions, including the use of integrating factors and the separability of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of finding the homogeneous solution (yh) and particular solution (yp), with some questioning the necessity of finding both if the equation is separable. There are attempts to manipulate the equation into a separable form and discussions about the implications of assuming yp' = 0.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various approaches and questioning the validity of certain methods. Some participants suggest that the equation can be simplified, while others explore the implications of different integration techniques. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of integrating functions involving e^{t^2}, with some expressing uncertainty about the integration process and its implications for solving the differential equation.

luitzen
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve DE:y' + 2ty = 5t

The Attempt at a Solution


For yh: y' + 2ty = 0
y' = -2ty
Thus int(y-1,y) = int(-2t,t)
ln(y) = -t2 + C1
y = e-t2 + C1 = eC1e-t2 = Ce-t2

To find yp there are two ways to do it. With an integrating factor exp(-A(t)) where A'(t) = 2t or by saying yp = v(t)yh(t). Both ways will result in int(e-t2,t) which is unsolvable.

So I checked up the answer which read 5/2 + Cet2, so yp(t)=5/2. So I checked it by entering 5/2 in the DE and of course it was right.

Now my question is, how would you arrive at that answer? When would you make the assumption yp' = 0 and check if it is right? Isn't that too trivial? And when you would find an answer for yp' = 0, would you stop searching for another answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi luitzen! :smile:

Can't you just argue that

[tex]y^\prime+2ty=5t[/tex]

is equivalent with

[tex]y^\prime=t(5-2y)[/tex]

and thus

[tex]\frac{y^\prime}{5-2y}=t[/tex]
 
Yes, of course. The question was: Check if the following equations are separable equations and if yes, give the solution.

So, if you have a separable equation, you don't need to find yh and yp, am I right?

If that's not the case, you try to find yh and after that yp, right?

Thank you very much:)
 
luitzen said:
Yes, of course. The question was: Check if the following equations are separable equations and if yes, give the solution.

So, if you have a separable equation, you don't need to find yh and yp, am I right?

Right! Seperable equations are easy!

If that's not the case, you try to find yh and after that yp, right?

Indeed, if the equation is not seperable, then you'll need to do other tricks. For example, working with yh and yp...
 
In my opinion, the best way to have worked that problem is to observe that it is a linear first order so you can multiply by [itex]e^{t^2}[/itex] making an exact derivative.
 
How would you integrate et2?
 
You shouldn't have to. How are you coming up with that integral?
 
luitzen said:
How would you integrate et2?

You wouldn't:
[tex]e^{t^2}y'+2te^{t^2}y=5te^{t^2}[/tex]
[tex](ye^{t^2})' =5te^{t^2}[/tex]
 
Ok this is what I did:
[itex]2ty-5t+y'=0[/itex]

[itex]e^{t^{2}}\left(2ty-5t\right)+e^{t^{2}}y'=0[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{\partial F\left(y,t\right)}{\partial t}=e^{t^{2}}\left(2ty-5t\right)[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{\partial F\left(y,t\right)}{\partial y}=e^{t^{2}}[/itex]
 
  • #10
LCKurtz said:
You wouldn't:
[tex]e^{t^2}y'+2te^{t^2}y=5te^{t^2}[/tex]
[tex](ye^{t^2})' =5te^{t^2}[/tex]
If I follow that route, I'll get this:

[itex]\left(ye^{t^{2}}\right)'=5te^{t^{2}}[/itex]

[itex]ye^{t^{2}}=\int5te^{t^{2}}dt[/itex]

[itex]\int5te^{t^{2}}dt=5t\int e^{t^{2}}dt-5\int\int e^{t^{2}}dtdt[/itex]

[itex]y=5e^{t^{-2}}\left(t\int e^{t^{2}}dt-\int\int e^{t^{2}}dtdt\right)[/itex]
 
  • #11
No, no, no!

Let [itex]u= t^2[/itex]. Then du= 2t dt, tdt= du/2.
 
  • #12
lol, I think I use integration by parts too quickly.

It's not too hard, but I still don't get it why it's easier though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K