Solve Dipole Problem: Help with E_y = kqd/r^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a dipole problem in electrostatics, specifically focusing on calculating the electric field component E_y using the formula E_y = kqd/r^3. Participants are exploring the breakdown of electric fields into components and addressing issues related to signs and assumptions in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to resolve the electric field components by breaking them down into x and y components. There is a focus on the cancellation of x components and the simplification of y components. Questions are raised about the negative sign in the calculations and the implications of the assumption r >> d.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on addressing the negative sign and the simplification of the denominator in the electric field equation. There is an ongoing exploration of the conventions used in the problem, and multiple interpretations of the setup are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the distance between charges and the test charge, as well as the relevance of the magnitudes of the charges involved. There is mention of a free body diagram and the conventions used in determining the direction of electric fields.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
!dipole!

Picture12.png


Okay. So I am trying to do this kind of the old fashioned way. I broke the E's down into x and y component and am adding them together component-wise.

I have found that the x components cancel out. Now I am trying to widdle down the form I have for the y components. As of now I have that:

[tex]E_y=k[\frac{-|q_1|-|q_2|}{[(d/2)^2+r^2]^{1/2}}*\frac{d/2}{[(d/2)^2+r^2]^{1/2}}[/tex]


The text has it in the form: [tex]kqd/r^3[/tex] which I am having a hard time getting.

How do I get rid of the negative sign? AND how do I make use of the fact r>>d??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone??
 
q1 and q2 are equal.

In your first term you have the denominator to the 1/2. That shouldn't be there. Check your work.

I'm not sure what to say about the negative sign because I'm not sure how you came up with it.

If r>>d then you can ignore your (d/2)^2 term in the denominator because it will be negligible compared to r^2.
 
Last edited:
I got the negative sign when I drew the free body diagram of my test charge. Since q_o is +, both fields are in the negative y direction.

Or should I just be considering their magnitude of 2q in this case and forget which direction they point?

hage567 said:
q1 and q2 are equal.

In your first term you have the denominator to the 1/2. That shouldn't be there. Check your work.

It is to the 1/2 because it is the distance from each q to p [itex]c^2=b^2+a^2[/itex]
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
I got the negative sign when I drew the free body diagram of my test charge. Since q_o is +, both fields are in the negative y direction.

OK, that's just a matter of convention then. You could have made it positive if you wanted.

Or should I just be considering their magnitude of 2q in this case and forget which direction they point?

Since the y components are in the same direction (and equal magnitude), you can just say that E = 2*Ey (where Ey is the y component from one of the charges).

It is to the 1/2 because it is the distance from each
The general equation is [tex]E = \frac{kq}{x^2}[/tex] right?

So you found the length of the hypotenuse using Pythagorus, so [tex]x^2 = (\frac{d}{2})^2 + r^2[/tex]

So there is no need to take the square root to get just x, since you need x^2 in your equation anyway. Does that make sense? Just the first term in your denominator is wrong, the second one is right.
 
hage567 said:
OK, that's just a matter of convention then. You could have made it positive if you wanted.



Since the y components are in the same direction (and equal magnitude), you can just say that E = 2*Ey (where Ey is the y component from one of the charges).


The general equation is [tex]E = \frac{kq}{x^2}[/tex] right?

So you found the length of the hypotenuse using Pythagorus, so [tex]x^2 = (\frac{d}{2})^2 + r^2[/tex]

So there is no need to take the square root to get just x, since you need x^2 in your equation anyway. Does that make sense? Just the first term in your denominator is wrong, the second one is right.

Oh crap-ass! I do crap like this all the time. . . Thanks hage!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K