Solve Dipole Problem: Help with E_y = kqd/r^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
!dipole!

Picture12.png


Okay. So I am trying to do this kind of the old fashioned way. I broke the E's down into x and y component and am adding them together component-wise.

I have found that the x components cancel out. Now I am trying to widdle down the form I have for the y components. As of now I have that:

[tex]E_y=k[\frac{-|q_1|-|q_2|}{[(d/2)^2+r^2]^{1/2}}*\frac{d/2}{[(d/2)^2+r^2]^{1/2}}[/tex]


The text has it in the form: [tex]kqd/r^3[/tex] which I am having a hard time getting.

How do I get rid of the negative sign? AND how do I make use of the fact r>>d??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
q1 and q2 are equal.

In your first term you have the denominator to the 1/2. That shouldn't be there. Check your work.

I'm not sure what to say about the negative sign because I'm not sure how you came up with it.

If r>>d then you can ignore your (d/2)^2 term in the denominator because it will be negligible compared to r^2.
 
Last edited:
I got the negative sign when I drew the free body diagram of my test charge. Since q_o is +, both fields are in the negative y direction.

Or should I just be considering their magnitude of 2q in this case and forget which direction they point?

hage567 said:
q1 and q2 are equal.

In your first term you have the denominator to the 1/2. That shouldn't be there. Check your work.

It is to the 1/2 because it is the distance from each q to p [itex]c^2=b^2+a^2[/itex]
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
I got the negative sign when I drew the free body diagram of my test charge. Since q_o is +, both fields are in the negative y direction.

OK, that's just a matter of convention then. You could have made it positive if you wanted.

Or should I just be considering their magnitude of 2q in this case and forget which direction they point?

Since the y components are in the same direction (and equal magnitude), you can just say that E = 2*Ey (where Ey is the y component from one of the charges).

It is to the 1/2 because it is the distance from each
The general equation is [tex]E = \frac{kq}{x^2}[/tex] right?

So you found the length of the hypotenuse using Pythagorus, so [tex]x^2 = (\frac{d}{2})^2 + r^2[/tex]

So there is no need to take the square root to get just x, since you need x^2 in your equation anyway. Does that make sense? Just the first term in your denominator is wrong, the second one is right.
 
hage567 said:
OK, that's just a matter of convention then. You could have made it positive if you wanted.



Since the y components are in the same direction (and equal magnitude), you can just say that E = 2*Ey (where Ey is the y component from one of the charges).


The general equation is [tex]E = \frac{kq}{x^2}[/tex] right?

So you found the length of the hypotenuse using Pythagorus, so [tex]x^2 = (\frac{d}{2})^2 + r^2[/tex]

So there is no need to take the square root to get just x, since you need x^2 in your equation anyway. Does that make sense? Just the first term in your denominator is wrong, the second one is right.

Oh crap-ass! I do crap like this all the time. . . Thanks hage!