Solve Distance from Velocity Time Graph - Vf2=Vo2+2ad

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving for distance using a velocity-time graph, specifically applying the formula Vf² = Vo² + 2ad. The user calculates distances for two segments: 16m for the first part (from t=1 to t=4) and 90m for the second part (from t=5 to t=15), totaling 114m. However, the expected answer is 110m, leading to confusion regarding the calculation of distance between t=8 and t=9. The user questions the consistency of acceleration in that interval, noting that the slope of the graph changes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically Vf² = Vo² + 2ad
  • Familiarity with velocity-time graphs and their interpretation
  • Basic knowledge of calculating distance using average velocity
  • Ability to analyze changes in acceleration based on graph slopes
NEXT STEPS
  • Review kinematic equations and their applications in physics
  • Study the concept of area under the curve in velocity-time graphs
  • Learn how to calculate distance for varying acceleration scenarios
  • Explore methods for estimating distances in segments with changing slopes
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding motion analysis through velocity-time graphs.

ThomasMagnus
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
The diagram is in the attachment.

This is my attempt at a solution.

Part 1 from t=1 to t=4
a=2
Vo=0
Vf=8

Vf2=Vo2 +2ad

64=0+2(2)(D)

64= 4D

D=16m for the first part

Part 2 from t=5 to t=15
Vo=9
Vf=9
a=0

V=d/t
9=d/(15-5)
d=90m for the second part

there are also 8 blocks below that half-three quarter block between t8 and t9

Total distance= 90+16 +8=114m

The correct answer is 110m. Are they just rounding down? I think I am off because of that part between t=8 and t=9. I can't seem to final the distance in that interval. This is what I tried:
Vf=9
Vo=8
t=1
a=1

Vf2=Vo2+2ad
81=64+2D
17=2D
D=8.5m

However this does not seem to work...

Can you please help me with where I am going wrong?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    14.1 KB · Views: 459
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to work if I use 2m/s^2 for the part between t=8 and t=9, but why would the acceleration be the same? The slope of the graph is changing in that part isn't it?
 
Area under the curve is distance. With multiple guess, closest answer is usually correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K