Solve Elastic Collision: 2D Homework

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an elastic collision between two rubber pucks of equal mass on a frictionless surface. The red puck is initially at rest while the blue puck is moving with a specified speed. The task is to determine the final velocities of both pucks after the collision, given their directions post-collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of momentum in both x and y directions, with attempts to express final velocities in terms of each other. There are questions about the accuracy of calculations and the significance of rounding during intermediate steps.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on maintaining significant figures throughout calculations, suggesting that this could affect the accuracy of the final results. There is also a note of concern regarding the physical realism of the calculated energy post-collision, indicating that assumptions about the collision being elastic may need to be revisited.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of rounding and significant figures, as well as the definitions of elastic collisions in the context of energy conservation. There is an acknowledgment that the problem may not adhere to the expected physical principles based on the results obtained.

Valenti
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A red and a blue rubber puck are free to slide along a frictionless air table. Each has a mass of 40 grams. They collide in an elastic collision. Initially the red one is at rest and the blue one is traveling in the x direction with a speed of 4 m/s. After the collision the blue one is traveling in the direction +30 degrees, with the red one traveling in the direction ‐55 degrees. Using conservation of energy and momentum find the speed of each puck after the collision.

Homework Equations


m1v1i+m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f

The Attempt at a Solution


Really not too sure about this question so my answer may be way off

Solve for the momentum in each direction
m1v1i+m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f
X Direction
m1v1i+m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f
0.04kg(4m/s) + 0.04kg(0m/s) = 0.04 (v1f cos30) + 0.04(v2f cos-55)
0.16kgm/s = 0.03v1f + 0.02v2f

Y Direction
m1v1i+m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f
0.04kg(0) + 0.04kg(0m/s) = 0.04kg(v1f sin30) + 0.04kg (v2f sin-55)
0 = 0.02v1f - 0.03 v2f

Solve for one of the Velocities
0 = 0.02v1f - 0.03 v2f
0.03v2f = 0.02v1f
v2f = 2/3 v1f

Replace with new velocity
0.16kgm/s = 0.03v1f + 0.02v2f
0.16kgm/s = 0.03v1f + 0.02(2/3)v1f
0.16kgm/s = 0.03v1f + 1/75 v1f
0.16kgm/s = 13/300 v1f
3.69m/s = v1f

Solve for v2f
v2f = 2/3 v1f
v2f = 2/3 (3.69 m/s)
v2f = 2.46 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rounding to only 1 significant digit at intermediate steps might be making your final answer very inaccurate.
Best is to avoid plugging in numbers until the final step. Work entirely symbolically, even providing symbolic variables to represent data given as numbers. It has numerous advantages.
When you do plug in the numbers, keep 3 or 4 significant digits in order to quote an answer of 2 or 3 digits. Even then, watch out if at some point you find you take the difference between two numbers that are close in value.
I reconstructed the initial velocity from your answers and the x momentum equation and got 4.6 m/s.
 
haruspex said:
Rounding to only 1 significant digit at intermediate steps might be making your final answer very inaccurate.
Best is to avoid plugging in numbers until the final step. Work entirely symbolically, even providing symbolic variables to represent data given as numbers. It has numerous advantages.
When you do plug in the numbers, keep 3 or 4 significant digits in order to quote an answer of 2 or 3 digits. Even then, watch out if at some point you find you take the difference between two numbers that are close in value.
I reconstructed the initial velocity from your answers and the x momentum equation and got 4.6 m/s.
Ah alright thanks I'll be sure to do that for upcoming questions. As for this question not counting my errors in significant digits was it wrong, or did i have the right procedure?
 
Valenti said:
Ah alright thanks I'll be sure to do that for upcoming questions. As for this question not counting my errors in significant digits was it wrong, or did i have the right procedure?
The method was fine.
 
You round off too much during the calculation. If you keep one significant digit only, the result will be less accurate than one digit. So you can write 4m/s = v1f and v2f = 2m/s. The data were given with two digits. You need keep at last 3 digits during the calculation to reach the result with accuracy of one digit.
By the way, the problem gives both angles, so you can solve for the velocities using conservation of momentum alone. According to the results, the collision is not elastic, energy is not conserved. Your result gives more energy after collision it was before, so it is impossible. Calculating with enough accuracy, the final energy is a bit less than the initial one, a Physically realistic result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K