MHB Solve f(t) with Heaviside Functions: Find b

AI Thread Summary
The function f(t) is expressed using Heaviside functions as f(t) = 7H(t) + bH(t-5), with the goal of determining the value of b. The calculation shows that at t = 5, f(5) equals 15, leading to the equation 15 = 49 + 7b, which simplifies to b = -34/7. However, a key point raised is that the function cannot be represented as a combination of Heaviside steps without addressing its domain, which is limited to positive real numbers. It is suggested to redefine the function as f(x) = 7H(x) + 8H(x-5) to ensure it is valid across the intended intervals. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly specifying the function's domain when using Heaviside functions.
Uniman
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Consider the function

Then f(t) can be expressed with Heaviside functions as

Determine b.

Workdone so far...

f(t) = 7H(t) + bH(t-5)
when t = 5
f(5) = 49 + 7b
15 = 49 + 7b
-34 = 7b
b = -34/7
http://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/-q3136934#
Is the answer correct...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Uniman said:
Consider the function

Then f(t) can be expressed with Heaviside functions as

Determine b.

Workdone so far...

f(t) = 7H(t) + bH(t-5)
when t = 5
f(5) = 49 + 7b
15 = 49 + 7b
-34 = 7b
b = -34/7
Is the answer correct...

As it is written your function cannot be written as a combination of Heaviside steps, since such a combination is defined on the whole real line, but the domain of your function is just the positive real line. So you either to use Heaviside steps restricted to the \(x>0\) of you need to specify that your function is zero foir \(x<0\).

Anyway what you probably want is \(f(x)=7H(x)+8H(x-5)\) and then to check that this is correct at the steps (this is \(0\) up to \(0\), \(7\) from \(0\) to \(5\) and \(7+8=15\) past \(x=5\) )

Also remove the link from your post.

CB
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top