MHB Solve f(t) with Heaviside Functions: Find b

Uniman
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Consider the function

Then f(t) can be expressed with Heaviside functions as

Determine b.

Workdone so far...

f(t) = 7H(t) + bH(t-5)
when t = 5
f(5) = 49 + 7b
15 = 49 + 7b
-34 = 7b
b = -34/7
http://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/-q3136934#
Is the answer correct...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Uniman said:
Consider the function

Then f(t) can be expressed with Heaviside functions as

Determine b.

Workdone so far...

f(t) = 7H(t) + bH(t-5)
when t = 5
f(5) = 49 + 7b
15 = 49 + 7b
-34 = 7b
b = -34/7
Is the answer correct...

As it is written your function cannot be written as a combination of Heaviside steps, since such a combination is defined on the whole real line, but the domain of your function is just the positive real line. So you either to use Heaviside steps restricted to the \(x>0\) of you need to specify that your function is zero foir \(x<0\).

Anyway what you probably want is \(f(x)=7H(x)+8H(x-5)\) and then to check that this is correct at the steps (this is \(0\) up to \(0\), \(7\) from \(0\) to \(5\) and \(7+8=15\) past \(x=5\) )

Also remove the link from your post.

CB
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top