Solve for Complex Number \(z\) Given \(4+i(4z+1)=2re^{i(\pi+\theta)}\)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving for the complex number \(z\) given the equation \(4+i(4z+1)=2re^{i(\pi+\theta)}\). Participants explore various methods for expressing \(z\) in the form \(a+ib\), including Cartesian and polar forms, while addressing the complexities involved in the solution process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest expanding both sides of the equation in Cartesian form and equating real and imaginary parts to solve for \(r\) and \(\theta\).
  • Others propose rewriting the left-hand side in polar form and equating modulus and arguments as an alternative method.
  • One participant questions whether to expand \(z\) itself in the Cartesian approach, receiving confirmation that it is necessary for forming simultaneous equations.
  • Another participant expresses difficulty in forming equations with too many unknowns, leading to confusion about the number of variables involved.
  • Some participants discuss the potential complexity of solving for \(r\) and \(\theta\) and whether it is a worthwhile approach compared to direct algebraic manipulation.
  • One participant shares their derived equations for \(r\) and \(\theta\) and seeks validation on their method, indicating a struggle with the algebraic manipulation required.
  • There is mention of needing to present the final answer in the form \(a+ib\) after determining \(r\) and \(\theta\), raising concerns about the efficiency of the method used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the best method to approach the problem, with no consensus on a single preferred method. Some favor Cartesian expansion while others lean towards polar forms, indicating a lack of agreement on the most effective strategy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equations derived may lead to complications due to the number of unknowns and the algebraic steps involved, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Punch
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Given \(z=r(cos\theta+isin\theta)\), solve for \(z\) in the form \(a+ib\) if \(4+i(4z+1)=2re^{i(\pi+\theta)}\)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: complex numbers

Punch said:
Given \(z=r(cos\theta+isin\theta)\), solve for \(z\) in the form \(a+ib\) if \(4+i(4z+1)=2re^{i(\pi+\theta)}\)

Use \$ delimiters around in-line LaTeX maths and \$\$ delimiters around display LaTeX maths.

CB
 
Re: complex numbers

Punch said:
Given \(z=r(cos\theta+isin\theta)\), solve for \(z\) in the form \(a+ib\) if \(4+i(4z+1)=2re^{i(\pi+\theta)}\)

Expand both sides in Cartesian form, remembering that \(e^{i\phi}=\cos(\phi)+i \sin(\phi)\), then equate real and imaginary parts and solve for \(r\) and \( \theta \)

Alternative method: rewrite the left hand side in polar form and equate modulus and arguments.

CB
 
Re: complex numbers

CaptainBlack said:
Expand both sides in Cartesian form, remembering that \(e^{i\phi}=\cos(\phi)+i \sin(\phi)\), then equate real and imaginary parts and solve for \(r\) and \( \theta \)

Alternative method: rewrite the left hand side in polar form and equate modulus and arguments.

CB

One question, do i expand z too?

For the cartesian approach yes, it then will give you a pair of simultaneous equations in \(r\) and \(\theta\) to solve.

CB
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Punch said:
Given \(z=r(cos\theta+isin\theta)\), solve for \(z\) in the form \(a+ib\) if \(4+i(4z+1)=2re^{i(\pi+\theta)}\)

\[ \displaystyle \begin{align*} 4 + i\left(4z + 1\right) &= 2r\,e^{i\left(\pi + \theta\right)} \\ 4 + i\left(4z + 1\right) &= 2r\left[\cos{\left( \pi + \theta \right)} + i\sin{\left( \pi + \theta \right)} \right] \\ 4 + i\left(4z + 1\right) &= 2r\left[-\cos{\left(\theta\right)} - i\sin{\left(\theta\right)}\right] \\ 4 + i\left(4z + 1\right) &= -2r\left[\cos{\left(\theta\right)} + i\sin{\left(\theta\right)} \right] \\ 4 + i\left(4z + 1\right) &= -2z \end{align*} \]

Now solve for $\displaystyle z$.
 
Prove It said:
\[ \displaystyle \begin{align*} 4 + i\left(4z + 1\right) &= 2r\,e^{i\left(\pi + \theta\right)} \\ 4 + i\left(4z + 1\right) &= 2r\left[\cos{\left( \pi + \theta \right)} + i\sin{\left( \pi + \theta \right)} \right] \\ 4 + i\left(4z + 1\right) &= 2r\left[-\cos{\left(\theta\right)} - i\sin{\left(\theta\right)}\right] \\ 4 + i\left(4z + 1\right) &= -2r\left[\cos{\left(\theta\right)} + i\sin{\left(\theta\right)} \right] \\ 4 + i\left(4z + 1\right) &= -2z \end{align*} \]

Now solve for $\displaystyle z$.

I see that there is another method to solve. But could u also show me the method of solving for theta and r?
 
Punch said:
I see that there is another method to solve. But could u also show me the method of solving for theta and r?

No.
1) It's longer.
2) It's much more difficult.
3) It's pointless when there is a much more straightforward method such as what I have shown you.
 
Punch said:
I see that there is another method to solve. But could u also show me the method of solving for theta and r?

Just write the equations out in Cartesian form, the solution from that point is easier than you might think once you see the form of the equations.

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
Just write the equations out in Cartesian form, the solution from that point is easier than you might think once you see the form of the equations.

CB

Really? Because that was my first instinct as well, and ended up with two equations in four unknowns...
 
  • #10
Prove It said:
Really? Because that was my first instinct as well, and ended up with two equations in four unknowns...

There are only two unknowns \(r\) and \(\theta\) (even in the Cartesian form of the equations). Eliminate \(r\) by dividing one by the other (after a bit of rearrangement) and you are left with a linear equation in \(\tan(\theta)\) (at least after dividing top and bottom by \(\cos(\theta)\) )

On second thoughts we are talking at cross purposes, I think what you mean is to write the equation as:

\(4+i(4z+1)=-2z\)

and then solve for \(z\) by common algebra and then simplify.

CB
 
Last edited:
  • #11
CaptainBlack said:
There are only two unknowns \(r\) and \(\theta\) (even in the Cartesian form of the equations). Eliminate \(r\) by dividing one by the other (after a bit of rearrangement) and you are left with a linear equation in \(\tan(\theta)\) (at least after dividing top and bottom by \(\cos(\theta)\) )

On second thoughts we are talking at cross purposes, I think what you mean is to write the equation as:

\(4+i(4z+1)=-2z\)

and then solve for \(z\) by common algebra and then simplify.

CB

I know what I did wrong now, I had forgotten that we were given $\displaystyle z = r\left[\cos{\left(\theta\right)} + i\sin{\left(\theta\right)}\right]$.
 
  • #12
CaptainBlack said:
There are only two unknowns \(r\) and \(\theta\) (even in the Cartesian form of the equations). Eliminate \(r\) by dividing one by the other (after a bit of rearrangement) and you are left with a linear equation in \(\tan(\theta)\) (at least after dividing top and bottom by \(\cos(\theta)\) )

On second thoughts we are talking at cross purposes, I think what you mean is to write the equation as:

\(4+i(4z+1)=-2z\)

and then solve for \(z\) by common algebra and then simplify.

CB

First, I am sorry as i had a problem using the latex... Please do me a favour by helping me to add the latex

Secondly, I tried using this approach and formed 2 equations \( r=\frac{sin(\pi+\theta)-1}{4cos\theta}\) and \(r=\frac{2}{cos9\pi+\theta0+2sin\theta}\)

Dividing one by the other, I formed the equation \(\frac{8}{(-1+2tan\theta)(-sin\theta-1)}=1\) which i couldn't solve for \(\theta\)...

The method is also very long. Did i do it the right way? Please show me the right way if i did not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Punch said:
First, I am sorry as i had a problem using the latex... Please do me a favour by helping me to add the latex

Secondly, I tried using this approach and formed 2 equations \( r=\frac{sin(\pi+\theta)-1}{4cos\theta}\) and \(r=\frac{2}{cos9\pi+\theta0+2sin\theta}\)

Dividing one by the other, I formed the equation \(\frac{8}{(-1+2tan\theta)(-sin\theta-1)}=1\) which i couldn't solve for \(\theta\)...

The method is also very long. Did i do it the right way? Please show me the right way if i did not.

The equations I get are:

\[4r \cos(\theta)+2r \sin(\theta)=-1\] \[2r \cos(\theta)-4r\sin(\theta)=-4\]

Which when divided give:

\[\frac{2 \cos(\theta)+\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)-2\sin(\theta)}=\frac{1}{4}\]

CB
 
  • #14
CaptainBlack said:
The equations I get are:

\[4r \cos(\theta)+2r \sin(\theta)=-1\] \[2r \cos(\theta)-4r\sin(\theta)=-4\]

Which when divided give:

\[\frac{2 \cos(\theta)+\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)-2\sin(\theta)}=\frac{1}{4}\]

CB

I will try it again, thanks

---------- Post added at 06:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:19 PM ----------

CaptainBlack said:
The equations I get are:

\[4r \cos(\theta)+2r \sin(\theta)=-1\] \[2r \cos(\theta)-4r\sin(\theta)=-4\]

Which when divided give:

\[\frac{2 \cos(\theta)+\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)-2\sin(\theta)}=\frac{1}{4}\]

CB

You're right. However, solving for theta is not the end of the story... The question requires the answer to be presented in the form a+ib. Am I right in saying that tackling the question using this method would take very long? Or is there another way to find a and b after solving for r and theta?
 
  • #15
Punch said:
You're right. However, solving for theta is not the end of the story... The question requires the answer to be presented in the form a+ib. Am I right in saying that tackling the question using this method would take very long? Or is there another way to find a and b after solving for r and theta?

\(a=r \cos(\theta),\ b=r \sin(\theta)\)

CB
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K