1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Solve for x(t), I just keep seeing 0

  1. Feb 28, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    [tex]\frac{dx}{dt} = \sqrt{2(\frac{E}{m}) -\omega^2 x^2}[/tex]


    2. Relevant equations

    [tex] \frac{dx}{dt} = v [/tex]

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I keep ending up with the statement x=0.

    [tex]\frac{dx}{dt}=\sqrt{2\frac{E}{m} -\omega^2 x^2}[/tex]

    Then
    [tex](dx/dt)^2 =2\frac{E}{m} -\omega^2 x^2 [/tex]

    and 1/2 mv^2 = E

    [tex](dx/dt)^2 = v^2 - 2 \omega^2 x^2[/tex]

    and with dx/dt being v that makes

    [tex]0=\omega^2x^2[/tex]

    and then I'm sad :-(
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 28, 2008 #2

    kdv

    User Avatar

    What is exactly the question you are trying to answer?

    In any case, what is E here? If it's th etotal energy, it's not simply 1/2 mv^2 since there is some potential energy.
     
  4. Feb 28, 2008 #3
    Just find x(t)

    I left off a 2 in my work that I just noticed and that seems to have changed things a bit. I have to rework some stuff and maybe see where that ends up. As for what E is, I don't know. Nor do I technically know that m is mass, but it seems awfully like they are. They weren't explicitly defined.
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2008
  5. Feb 28, 2008 #4

    kdv

    User Avatar

    Ok, then don't assume E is 1/2 mv^2

    This is a simple harmonic oscillator with E = 1/2 mv^2 + 1/2 k x^2.
     
  6. Feb 28, 2008 #5

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    If the problem is given just as the differential equation, you don't know what E is nor do you know that m is mass, how do you possibly conclude that E= (1/2)mv2?
    (And why is this a physics problem rather than a math problem?)
     
  7. Feb 28, 2008 #6
    At the time I felt that it was more of a physics problem.
     
  8. Feb 28, 2008 #7

    kdv

    User Avatar

    The best way to attack th eproblem is to differentiate your equation to get the second derivative [tex] \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} [/tex] Use the initial equation to rewrite the first derivative that appears in your result in terms of x itself. Then you will have an equation relating the second derivative to the function x(t) and you will be able to solve.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Solve for x(t), I just keep seeing 0
  1. The entropy when T=>0 (Replies: 2)

  2. Commutator [x,T]? (Replies: 3)

Loading...