Solve Inequalities algebraically

  • Thread starter Thread starter Panphobia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving inequalities algebraically, specifically focusing on the expression involving terms like \(2r + 3\), \(3r - 4\), and \(\sqrt{2r + 3}\). Participants are exploring the conditions under which these expressions yield valid results and how to determine the solution set for the inequalities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss identifying critical values that make expressions zero or undefined, and the implications of these values on the solution set. There is mention of using a two-column table to test intervals and determine positivity or negativity of the expressions. Some participants also explore the conditions under which products of terms are negative, questioning the relationships between the factors involved.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants sharing their reasoning and approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of critical values and testing intervals, but there is no explicit consensus on a single method or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the assumption that the expressions must be nonnegative, particularly regarding the square root term, and are considering the implications of this on their solution sets. There is also a focus on the intervals defined by the critical values identified in the discussion.

Panphobia
Messages
435
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


153wehw.png





The Attempt at a Solution


So when I started this question, I knew that 2r +3 > 0 in order for this whole thing to work so r > -3/2, and I know that if the middle term has to be more than 0, than only one more of the others is going to be negative, for the first term i found that r < 4/3 and the third was r < 2, so I know that the answer should be (4/3, 2), but how do I prove that algebraically?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Panphobia said:
So when I started this question, I knew that 2r +3 > 0 in order for this whole thing to work so r > -3/2, and I know that if the middle term has to be more than 0, than only one more of the others is going to be negative, for the first term i found that r < 4/3 and the third was r < 2, so I know that the answer should be (4/3, 2), but how do I prove that algebraically?
I wouldn't solve it "algebraically." I would solve it by making a two-column table. First, find values of r that would make the left side 0 or undefined (I call these critical values), which appears you have already done. Then in the first column list all critical values and all intervals bounded by these critical values.
Code:
Test interval|Value
-------------+----------
(-inf, -3/2) |undefined
r = -3/2     |0
(-3/2, 4/3)  |
r = 4/3      |0
(4/3, 2)     |
r = 2        |0
(2, inf)     |
In the second column, you fill in 0, undefined, positive, or negative. For the remaining intervals, pick a test value to plug into the inequality and you will eventually determine the solution set.
 
ohhhh ok, that makes sense. thank you.
 
Since the square root, \sqrt{2r+ 3}, is, by definition, nonnegative, you can (almost) ignore it. The product of the two numbers, 3r- 4 and \sqrt[3]{r- 2}, will be negative if and only if the two factors are of opposite order. In other words, either

1) 3r- 4> 0 and \sqrt[3]{r- 2}&lt; 0 or
2) 3r- 4< 0 and \sqrt[3]{r- 2}&gt; 0

Similarly, a positive number, cubed, is positive and a negative number, cubed, is negative. So that can be reduced to
1) 3r- 4> 0 and r- 2< 0 or
2) 3r- 4< 0 and r- 2> 0.

3r- 4> 0 for r> 4/3 and r- 2< 0 for r< 3. Those will both be true for 4/3< r< 3.
\sqrt{2r+ 3}= 0 only for r= -3/2 and that does not lie between 4/3 and 3.

(1) is true for 4/3< r< 3.

3r- r< 0 for r< 4/3 and r- 2> 0 for r> 3. (2) is never true.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K