MHB Solve Inequality & Simul Eqns: Alg Workings Q (a,b,c)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Help seeker
  • Start date Start date
Help seeker
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Q.
(a) Solve the inequality 5(3x + 1) <11x, Show clear algebraic working. (2)
(b) Solve the simultaneous equations 3x 2 + y 2 – 7 = 0, y – 3x – 5 = 0 Show clear algebraic working. (4)
(c) Hence find the value of x for which 5(x + 1) < x and 3x 2 + y 2 – 7 = 0 and y – 3x – 5 = 0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
assuming you mean ...

(a) $5(3x+1) \le 11x$

solve for $x$ as you would any other equation ...
though probably not necessary to know in this case, be aware that multiplying or dividing by a negative value changes the direction of the inequality

(b) $3x^2 + y^2 - 7 = 0$
$y - 3x - 5 = 0 \implies y = 3x+5$

I would substitute $(3x+5)$ for $y$ in the first equation and solve the resulting quadratic for $x$ ... note you'll get two ordered pairs that satisfy the system

(c) Decide which of the two (or maybe both) values for $x$ from part (b) satisfy the given inequality
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top