Solve Inverse Fifth Law Homework: Sign of A and Radii of Orbits

  • Thread starter Thread starter the keck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Law
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
the keck
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charged particle of mass m moves non-relativistically around a circular orbit. The potential energy is U(r)= -A/r^4.

What is the sign of A and why?
Using Bohr's quantization for angular momentum to calculate the allowed values of the radius.


Homework Equations



F=-dV/dx
F=mv^2/r
mvr=nh/2*Pi


The Attempt at a Solution



Intuitively, I thought that A is positive, cause classically you consider that at infinity, the potential is zero. However, when I determined the radius of orbits, it turns out that r^2 is negative, and you cannot square root it!

mv^2/r=-4*A/r^5 (Centripetal force to -dV/dx)

Sub it v=nh/2*PI*m*r

and r^2 = -4*m*A/n^2*H^2 where H=h/2*PI

Could I ignore the negative sign here?

Thanks

Regards,
The Keck
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

This seems some standard homework or exercise.
In your first equation:

mv^2/r=-4*A/r^5 (Centripetal force to -dV/dx)

You have a mistake in the sign of the right hand side when differentiating.


Best regards
 
No, I'm pretty sure I didn't make a mistake.

dV/dx= (-4 x -A)/r^5 = (4xA)/(r^5)

-dV/dx = F(x) = -4A/(r^5)

Regards,
The Keck
 
The signs are just fine. The problem is how to interpret them. The acceleration v^2/r is always pointed toward the center. When you are talking about the force of the potential, the positive r direction is usually outward toward larger r. So the negative sign on the force just means that it's directed inward also. The are both pointed in the same direction (for A positive). Just drop the superfluous sign.
 
Thanks, I understand what you mean now, it's just I didn't really think about it using that reasoning

Regards,
The Keck
 
Sorry, i did not expain very detail. I mean that:

[tex]\vec{F}=-\hat{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}U(r)=\frac{4A}{r^5}(-\hat{r})[/tex]

The acceleration in 2-D polar coordinate
[tex]\vec{a}=(\ddot{r}-\dot{\theta}^2r)\hat{r}+(r\ddot{\theta}+2\dot{r}\omega)\hat{\theta}[/tex]
The central acceleration in the case is [tex]\vec{a}=(-\dot{\theta}^2r)\hat{r}[/tex] only, where [tex]\dot{\theta} = \text{angular speed respect ro the origin} = \frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]

Therefore,
[tex]\frac{4A}{r^5}(-\hat{r})=m(-\frac{v^2}{r})\hat{r}\quad\Rightarrow\quad\frac{4A}{r^5}=m\frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]

However, Dick expained very well already.



Best regards