Solve Inverse Fifth Law Homework: Sign of A and Radii of Orbits

  • Thread starter Thread starter the keck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Law
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a charged particle of mass m moving in a circular orbit under a potential energy described by U(r) = -A/r^4. Participants are exploring the implications of the sign of A and the calculation of allowed radii using Bohr's quantization for angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the sign of A, with one suggesting it should be positive based on classical potential energy considerations. There is a focus on the implications of a negative radius squared derived from the equations, leading to questions about whether the negative sign can be ignored.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on interpreting the signs in the equations, suggesting that the signs are consistent with the direction of forces and accelerations. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations and clarifications regarding the mathematical setup without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing examination of the differentiation of potential energy and its implications for force direction. Participants are also considering the physical meaning of the derived equations in the context of circular motion.

the keck
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charged particle of mass m moves non-relativistically around a circular orbit. The potential energy is U(r)= -A/r^4.

What is the sign of A and why?
Using Bohr's quantization for angular momentum to calculate the allowed values of the radius.


Homework Equations



F=-dV/dx
F=mv^2/r
mvr=nh/2*Pi


The Attempt at a Solution



Intuitively, I thought that A is positive, cause classically you consider that at infinity, the potential is zero. However, when I determined the radius of orbits, it turns out that r^2 is negative, and you cannot square root it!

mv^2/r=-4*A/r^5 (Centripetal force to -dV/dx)

Sub it v=nh/2*PI*m*r

and r^2 = -4*m*A/n^2*H^2 where H=h/2*PI

Could I ignore the negative sign here?

Thanks

Regards,
The Keck
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

This seems some standard homework or exercise.
In your first equation:

mv^2/r=-4*A/r^5 (Centripetal force to -dV/dx)

You have a mistake in the sign of the right hand side when differentiating.


Best regards
 
No, I'm pretty sure I didn't make a mistake.

dV/dx= (-4 x -A)/r^5 = (4xA)/(r^5)

-dV/dx = F(x) = -4A/(r^5)

Regards,
The Keck
 
The signs are just fine. The problem is how to interpret them. The acceleration v^2/r is always pointed toward the center. When you are talking about the force of the potential, the positive r direction is usually outward toward larger r. So the negative sign on the force just means that it's directed inward also. The are both pointed in the same direction (for A positive). Just drop the superfluous sign.
 
Thanks, I understand what you mean now, it's just I didn't really think about it using that reasoning

Regards,
The Keck
 
Sorry, i did not expain very detail. I mean that:

\vec{F}=-\hat{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}U(r)=\frac{4A}{r^5}(-\hat{r})

The acceleration in 2-D polar coordinate
\vec{a}=(\ddot{r}-\dot{\theta}^2r)\hat{r}+(r\ddot{\theta}+2\dot{r}\omega)\hat{\theta}
The central acceleration in the case is \vec{a}=(-\dot{\theta}^2r)\hat{r} only, where \dot{\theta} = \text{angular speed respect ro the origin} = \frac{v^2}{r}

Therefore,
\frac{4A}{r^5}(-\hat{r})=m(-\frac{v^2}{r})\hat{r}\quad\Rightarrow\quad\frac{4A}{r^5}=m\frac{v^2}{r}

However, Dick expained very well already.



Best regards
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
972
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K