Solve Mass Suspension by Component Method

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a mass of 100 kg suspended by two ropes at a 60-degree angle, with an additional horizontal pull of 200 N. Participants emphasize the importance of incorporating the 200 N force into the equilibrium equations to accurately determine the tensions in the ropes. The component method is recommended for resolving forces in three dimensions, and a free body diagram is suggested for clarity. Ultimately, the correct approach involves analyzing the system's geometry and applying force balances in the x, y, and z directions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of equilibrium in physics
  • Familiarity with the component method for force analysis
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams
  • Basic trigonometry related to angles and force components
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to draw and interpret free body diagrams in three dimensions
  • Study the component method for analyzing forces in equilibrium
  • Explore the effects of additional forces on tension in ropes
  • Review trigonometric functions and their applications in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and equilibrium problems, as well as educators seeking to explain complex force interactions in three-dimensional systems.

yoyo16
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass of 100 kg is suspended by two ropes that make an angle of 60 degrees to the horizontal. If a horizontal pull of 200N, in a plane perpendicular to the plane of the other forces is applied find the tensions in the ropes after equilibrium has occurred.

Homework Equations


Component Method

The Attempt at a Solution


T1cos60=T2cos60
T2=(T1cos60)/(cos60)

Fx=-T1cos60+T2cos60
Fy=T1sin60+T2sin60-Fg

Sub in T2 into equation
Fy=T1sin60+T2sin60-Fg
= (T1sin60)+((T1cos60)/(cos60))(sin60)
= T1sin60+T1(0.866)
=T1(sin60+0.866)=(100)/(9.8)
T1=T2=565.8

Can someone please tell me if I did this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't look it. You solved the problem without the 200 N force.
 
What would the 200 N force be?
 
The one in the problem statement:
If a horizontal pull of 200N, in a plane perpendicular to the plane of the other forces is applied find the tensions in the ropes after equilibrium has occurred.
 
Yes but how would I put that in the equation? When using the component method and drawing the diagram where would I place the 200N?
 
"In the plane perpendicular to the plane of the other forces." If the tensions and weights are initially lying in the xy-plane, the horizontal 200-N force would point in the z direction.
 
Would the 200N be for both ropes? And if the 200N was for the z direction, how would you find the tension of the ropes? Wouldn't the 200N be the tension then?
 
This is a bit of a complicated problem geometrically. Before you start worrying about the forces involved, you need to consider in detail the 3D geometry (after the 200 N force has been applied). When the 200 N force pushes horizontally on the mass, the plane that had originally contained the two ropes and the mass rotates out of the vertical by an angle of, say, θ. The two ropes now have components in all three spatial directions. The simplest thing to do is to resolve the unit vector pointing in the direction along each of the ropes into components in the x, y, and z directions (in terms of i, j, k, and the angle θ). You can then draw a free body diagram of the mass, and do force balances in the x, y, and z directions in terms of θ. This will allow you to solve for the tensions in the ropes and the angle θ. Figuring out the geometry and resolving the rope unit vectors into components is the complicated part of this problem.

Chet
 
You can also reduce it to a two-dimensional problem in the plane of the ropes. That makes the geometry a lot simpler.
 
  • #10
vela said:
You can also reduce it to a two-dimensional problem in the plane of the ropes. That makes the geometry a lot simpler.
Yes. Excellent suggestion. I like that much better.

Chet
 
  • #11
I'm still not understanding the concept of the 200N. Is it not possible to solve it without taking account of the horizontal pull. By using the horizontal pull, how would you use the component method? Can someone please try explaining this to me, I'm so confused. :0
 
  • #12
Step 1 is drawing a figure looking edge-on on the plane containing the ropes, after the 200 N force is applied. Can you please show us what your figure looks like.

Chet
 
  • #13
yoyo16 said:
I'm still not understanding the concept of the 200N. Is it not possible to solve it without taking account of the horizontal pull.
Of course not. The problem is asking you to find the tension in the ropes when the system is in equilibrium when the 200-N force is applied. You can't possibly get the right answer if you omit that force.

By using the horizontal pull, how would you use the component method? Can someone please try explaining this to me, I'm so confused. :0
It seems to me you might not even understand the basic configuration of the ropes, mass, and force. If you don't understand that, you can't possibly hope to even begin analyzing the situation. It would help if, as Chet suggested, you show us a sketch (or two) of what you think is going on.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
37K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
7K