Solve Modified Atwood Problem: Find T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 & F

  • Thread starter Thread starter go2cnavy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atwood
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Modified Atwood Problem involves a 10.2 Kg block supported by a massless rope over two massless, frictionless pulleys. The tensions calculated are T1=99.96N, T2=49.98N, T3=49.98N, T4=-(mg+F)=149.94N, T5=49.98N, and the force F required to maintain equilibrium is -49.98N. The uniform tension throughout the rope is due to its massless nature, not merely the system's equilibrium. Proper rounding and significant figures are essential for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with tension in ropes and pulleys
  • Basic knowledge of static equilibrium
  • Experience with significant figures in physics calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in mechanical systems
  • Learn about tension forces in pulley systems
  • Explore the effects of massless ropes and frictionless pulleys on tension
  • Review significant figures and rounding rules in physics calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of pulley systems and static equilibrium.

go2cnavy
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Q: A 10.2 Kg block is held in place by a massless rope passing over two massless, frictionless pulleys. Find the tensions T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and the magitude of force F. Please see attached file for picture.

I know:

T1=mg=99.96N

My question, since the system is in equilibrium, shouldn't T2=T3=T5? IN addition, wouldn't T4 be equal but opposite to T3? I just get confused on how to set up the system of equations. Please help.
 

Attachments

  • quiz4.jpg
    quiz4.jpg
    12.6 KB · Views: 1,818
Physics news on Phys.org
go2cnavy said:
My question, since the system is in equilibrium, shouldn't T2=T3=T5?
This is true because the rope is massless and the pulleys are frictionless, not because the system is in equilibrium. Under these conditions, the tension is uniform throughout that piece of rope.

IN addition, wouldn't T4 be equal but opposite to T3?
Why do you think that? Consider the top pulley: What forces pull up on it? What forces pull down?
 
I had to see it for myself in a real world application. Today I set up the pulleys at physics lab and used a 200 gram mass as the hanging weight.

This gives my T1=mg=1.96 N.

The amount of force F required to keep the system static was .8N measured with a spring scale.

In addition, the pulley system was alos hanging from a spring scale and the tension at T4 was @ the sum of the pulley weights+T1+F.

If I let T1 = mg=(10.2)(-9.8)=-99.96N, Then is it safe to conclude that
T2+T3=99.96N so T2 and T3 each = 49.98N
 
Sounds like you've got it. :approve:
 
Thank you! I just found this site and will be here often now. Please check my work...

mg=99.98N
T1=99.96N
T2=49.98N
T3=49.98N
T4=-(mg+F)=149.94N
T5=49.98N
F=-49.98N
 
Looks good. Two nitpicks: (1) Just give the magnitudes of the forces, forget the signs. (Tension in a rope is always positive.) (2) Round off to a reasonable number of significant figures. (Your results are not accurate to 4 digits!)
 
Thank you for the help and the advice. Much appreciated!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
14K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
21K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K