Solve pH & pKb Problems - Get Answers Now!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blink691
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving pH and pKb problems related to titration of weak bases and acids. Participants seek clarity on calculating pH after titration, determining the pKb from the pH at the equivalence point, and understanding the relationships between concentrations and volumes involved in these calculations. Key formulas and steps are provided, including how to find the molarity of the weak base and the dissociation constant of the weak acid formed during titration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of adjusting concentrations based on total volume and using the pH to find hydrogen ion concentrations. Overall, the thread serves as a resource for mastering titration calculations in chemistry.
Blink691
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
HELP! I just need the steps to figured out these 3 problem. I have the answes but I can't seem to figure out how to do it and my notes aren't helping. thanks!

Determine the pH of a solution obtained by titrating 25.00 mL of a 0.107 M solution of a weak base using 75.25 mL of 0.100 M HCl( aq) as a titrant. (hint: this involves a dilution problem.)

answer is 1.32

65.5 mL of a 0.0670 M HCl( aq) solution were required to titrate a 25.00 mL sample of a weak base to its equivalence point. The pH at the equivalence point was 4.668. What is the pK b of the weak base? (assume pK w = 14.00) (Remember, pH at the equivalence point is based on total volume.)

answer is 5.98

Determine the pH of a solution obtained by titrating 25.00 mL of a 0.121 M solution of a weak monoprotic acid using 60.25 mL of 0.125 M NaOH( aq) as a titrant. (assume pK w = 14.00) (hint: this involves a dilution problem.)

answer is 12.72
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me help you with the 2nd exercise.

You have the titration's equivalence point, so you can find the molarity of the weak base:

\[<br /> 65.5ml \times 0.067M = 25ml \times M_b <br /> \]
...where the unknown there is molarity of weak base.

Now you also need formal concentration of the weak conjugate acid which formed, which I like to show as WHCl, with ions WH+ and Cl-.
For this weak acid, you have dissociation constant equation:
\[<br /> K_a = \frac{{[H][W]}}{{[WHCl]}}<br /> \]
Please excuse the lack of signs in that Ka formula.

Since [H] is roughly close enough to [W-], you can also then say:
\[<br /> K_a = \frac{{[H][H]}}{{0.04848 - [H]}}<br /> \]
... Do you know where the 0.04848 comes from?

Now you need to use pH at equivalence, given, to find [H] value.
Since pH = 4.668, [H]= \[<br /> 2.148 \times 10^{ - 5} <br /> \]


Are you with this now? You can now easily find Ka; from which you use Ka*Kb=Kw to find your Kb value.
 
For the first one, the HCl is in excess, so all of the base will be used up. You need to calculate the total number of moles of the base and the HCl (n/V=M), then subtract the moles of HCl by the moles of the weak base, and use that to calculate the amount of H+ produced. Don't forget to adjust the concentration of HCl to account for the combined volume. The [H+] will equal the remainder of the [HCl], since HCl is a strong acid and completely reacts.

The last one can be solved the same way as the first one, except you calculate [OH-] instead of [H+] so you will have to solve for p[OH-]. p[OH-] + p[H+] = pKw = 14
 
Last edited:
symbolipoint said:
Now you need to use pH at equivalence, given, to find [H] value.
Since pH = 4.668, [H]= \[<br /> 2.148 \times 10^{ - 5} <br /> \]

Why do you have [H] = 2.148 x 10^-5?

pH = -log[H]
4.668 = -log[H]
10^-4.668 = [H]

edit: Oh lol, I should've put that in my calculator before posting.. they're the same thing. I wasn't thinking straight.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top