Solve Physics Problem: Gaussian Distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion addresses the calculation of the integral value under the bell curve for a Gaussian distribution, specifically between x = -1 and x = 1, with parameters xm = 0 and σx = 1. The integral evaluates to 0.68, derived from the formula 1.7/C(1), where C(1) equals √(2π) or approximately 2.5. The discussion emphasizes that this result holds true for any Gaussian distribution by transforming the standard Gaussian variable using the equation X = σx Y + xm, ensuring that the probability value remains consistent across different parameters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian distribution and its properties
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of probability density functions
  • Basic statistics concepts, including mean and standard deviation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Gaussian distribution formula
  • Learn about the Central Limit Theorem and its implications for Gaussian distributions
  • Explore numerical integration techniques for calculating areas under curves
  • Investigate transformations of random variables in probability theory
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or statistics, educators teaching probability and statistics, and anyone interested in understanding Gaussian distributions and their applications in real-world scenarios.

houseguest
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am attaching what was an extra credit question in my physics class which I didn't understand at all. The topic isn't in the book and all the internet searchs I read confuse me. I was hoping someone might give me a walk through.
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot.png
    Screenshot.png
    33.8 KB · Views: 705
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem states the integral value that is "under the bell curve" between x = - 1 and x = 1, for a Gaussian distribution with xm = 0 and σx = 1, which is the numerator of the probability expression (the denominator is \sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}). You should verify this by comparing the two formulas (the one on the left and the one at the top).

Since the integral is defined between -1 to 1, it is defined from xm - σx to xm + σx where xm = 0 and σx = 1.

Let C(\sigma)=\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}, then the answer is 1.7/C(1), for the standard Gaussian. Since C(1)=\sqrt{2\pi} = 2.5, the probability is 1.7/2.5 = 0.68.

But I can convert the standard Gaussian random variable x (with xm = 0 and σx = 1) to any other Gaussian random variable (with an arbitrary xm \ne 0 and an arbitrary σx > 0) by multiplying the standard one with σx > 0 then adding xm \ne 0. For example, X = σx Y + xm where Y is the standard Gaussian and X is any Gaussian, with mean xm \ne 0 and standard deviation σx > 0.

Let f(x;xmx) be the Gaussian density with an arbitrary xm and an arbitrary σx > 0. f(x;xmx) is identical to the formula on the left margin. The special case of standard Gaussian, f(y;0,1) is identical to the formula at the top of the page.

The conversion X = σx Y + xm does not affect the probability value as long as the bounds of integration (and the C value) are adjusted accordingly. Thus,

\int_{x_m-\sigma_x}^{x_m+\sigma_x}f(x;x_m,\sigma_x)dx\left/C(\sigma_x) = \int_{-1}^{1}f(y;0,1)dy\right/C(1) = 1.7/C(1) = 0.68.

So the answer is 0.68 not only for the standard Gaussian but for any Gaussian distribution.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K