Solve Reimann Sums and Integrals

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SheldonAustin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals Sums
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving Riemann sums and integrals, specifically using the formula for definite integrals: \(\int_{a}^{b}f(x) dx = F(b) - F(a)\). It presents a detailed example of calculating the definite integral of \(f(x) = 2x + 5\) over the interval [1, 2] using both Riemann sums and the anti-derivative approach, confirming that the integral evaluates to 8. Additionally, it highlights a critical perspective on the definition of Riemann integrability, referencing a counterexample involving rational and irrational numbers that challenges the validity of the initial definition provided.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals and anti-derivatives
  • Familiarity with Riemann sums and limits
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation and expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in detail
  • Explore advanced topics in Riemann integrability and counterexamples
  • Learn about Lebesgue integration as an alternative to Riemann sums
  • Practice solving various definite integrals using both Riemann sums and anti-derivative methods
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus, as well as anyone interested in deepening their understanding of integration techniques and the nuances of Riemann integrability.

SheldonAustin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We are already introduced to finding the value of definite integral by the anti-derivative approach

\int_{a}^{b}f(x) dx = F(b) - F(a)


In this approach we find the anti-derivative F(x) of f(x) and then subtract F(a) from F(b) to get the value of the definite integral

Reimann Sums is yet another method to compute the definite integral value from first principles

Let f(x) be a function defined on the closed interval [a,b] then the definite interval of f(x) from a to b is given by

`int_a^bf(x)dx` = `lim_(n->oo)(b-a)/n` `sum_(r=1)^n f(a+r` Δx)

where Δx = `(b - a)/n` ( provided the limit exits )

Examples for solve riemann sums and integrals

`int_1^2(2x+5)dx`

Let f(x) = 2x+5 and [a,b] = [1,2]

Δx = `(b-a)/n` = `(2-1)/n` =`1/n`

f(x) = 2x+5

f(a+rΔ) = f(1 + r`(1)/n` ) =2 (1 + r`(1)/n` ) + 5

By the Formula

`int_a^bf(x)dx` = `lim_(n->oo)(b-a)/n` `sum_(r=1)^n f(a+r` Δx)

where Δx = `(b - a)/n` ( provided the limit exits )

`int_1^2(2x+5)dx` = `lim_(n->oo)(1)/n` `sum_(r=1)^n ``(2(1+ r/n)+5)`

= `lim_(n->oo)(1)/n` `sum_(r=1)^n (7+ 2r/n)` <br>

`=lim_(n->oo)(1)/n sum_(r=1)^n``(7) +lim_(n->oo)(1)/n (2/n)sum_(r=1)^n (r)`

=`lim_(x->oo)1/n(7n)+1/n(2/n)lim_(n->oo) (n)(n+1)/2'`



`='lim_(n->oo)(7) +lim_(n->oo) 1/n(2/n)(n)(n+1)/2'`



`= 7 + lim_(n->oo)(n+1)/n`

`= 7 + lim_(n->oo)(1+ 1/n)`

`= 7 + 1`

`= 8`

Ans is 8

Let us Validate the Answer by using the anti-derivative Approach

`int_1^2(2x+5)dx= (2(x/2)^2 +5x)1^2`

`='(2^2-1^2) +5(2-1)'`

`= (4-1) + 5`

`= 3 +5`

`= 8`
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SheldonAustin said:
We are already introduced to finding the value of definite integral by the anti-derivative approach

\int_{a}^{b}f(x) dx = F(b) - F(a)


In this approach we find the anti-derivative F(x) of f(x) and then subtract F(a) from F(b) to get the value of the definite integral

It is the fundamental theorem of calculus that allows you to do this.

Let f(x) be a function defined on the closed interval [a,b] then the definite interval of f(x) from a to b is given by

`int_a^bf(x)dx` = `lim_(n->oo)(b-a)/n` `sum_(r=1)^n f(a+r` Δx)

where Δx = `(b - a)/n` ( provided the limit exits )

This "definition" is wrong! For example, take the interval [0,1] and consider the function f(x) = 1 when x is rational but f(x) = 0 when x is irrational. Then ##0 + r \, \Delta x## is always a rational hence the answer you'll get is 1. But the correct answer is "the function is not Riemann integral".

Take a look at the definition given on Wikipedia. It's very different to what you have written.

Edit: and it turns out Wikipedia talks about this as well. There you go.
 
Last edited:
Hello pwsnafu,

Thanks for replying, will rectify it soon.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K