MHB Solve Right Triangle Problem Without Knowing Bottom Line

AI Thread Summary
To solve a right triangle problem without knowing the base length, one can use trigonometric relationships involving angles. The angle θ can be utilized to find the hypotenuse (d) with the formula d = 16/cos(θ), where 16 meters is the adjacent side. The discussion raises skepticism about the possibility of determining a numerical value for d with only the angle θ provided. Clarification is sought on how one could arrive at a solution without additional information. Understanding these trigonometric principles is essential for solving similar problems effectively.
Jacob123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How would I have to calculate this question for an answer, a friend of mine told me he could get the answer without knowing that the bottom line was 16 meters, I can't seem to find a way that would work, I am not sure if I am missing something or he is lying.

Screenshot_90.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'd also like to know how your friend could determine a numerical value for $d$ just knowing the angle $\theta = 0.19$ with no other information.
If he let's you know how, post back and enlighten me.

Using the angle, $\theta$, value and the 16 meters ...

$\cos{\theta} = \dfrac{16}{d} \implies d = \dfrac{16}{\cos{\theta}}$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top