MHB Solve Simple Inequality: x < 0 or x > 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
The inequality (x - 1/2)² > x + 1/4 simplifies to x(x - 2) > 0, leading to the solution set x < 0 or x > 2. The discussion emphasizes completing the square as an effective method for solving quadratic inequalities. Participants note that responses may not appear immediately, which can lead to confusion about whether a question has been previously answered. The final conclusion is that the values of x satisfying the inequality are in the intervals (-∞, 0) and (2, +∞). This method provides a clear approach to solving similar quadratic inequalities.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote a question from Yahoo! Answers

Find the set of values of x for ( x - 1/2 )^2 > x + 1/4 . Answer: { x: x < 0 or x > 2 }
Please help me to show the solution...

I have given a link to the topic there so the OP can see my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We have $$\left (x - \frac{1}{2}\right )^2 > x + \frac{1}{4}\Leftrightarrow x^2-x+\frac{1}{4}>x + \frac{1}{4}\\\Leftrightarrow x^2-2x=0\Leftrightarrow x(x-2)>0$$
Then, $$x(x-2)>0\Leftrightarrow (x>0\wedge x-2>0)\vee(x<0\wedge x-2<0)\\\Leftrightarrow (x>0\wedge x>2)\vee(x<0\wedge x<2)\Leftrightarrow (x>2)\vee(x<0)$$
That is, $x$ is a solution of the inequality iff $x\in(-\infty,0)\cup (2,+\infty)$.

P.S. Sorry, I didn´t notice that this question had been already solved there. I might have to make an appointment to visit an Alzheimer's specialist.
 
Fernando Revilla said:
...
P.S. Sorry, I didn´t notice that this question had been already solved there. I might have to make an appointment to visit an Alzheimer's specialist.

I've noticed sometimes the replies of others do not show up until after you have posted a response. So, you may put off that appointment for now. (Happy)
 
I find that the most direct way to solve quadratic inequalities is to complete the square.

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( x - \frac{1}{2} \right) ^2 &> x + \frac{1}{4} \\ x^2 - x + \frac{1}{4} &> x + \frac{1}{4} \\ x^2 - 2x &> 0 \\ x^2 - 2x + (-1)^2 &> (-1)^2 \\ (x - 1)^2 &> 1 \\ |x - 1| &> 1 \\ x - 1 < -1 \textrm{ or } x - 1 &> 1 \\ x < 0 \textrm{ or } x &> 2 \end{align*}[/math]
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
821
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K