Solve Spring Compression Problem: Work & Energy Approach

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a .1 kg ball placed against a massless spring with a spring constant of 50,000 N/m, compressed by 2 m. The task is to determine how high the ball rises when fired straight up, assuming no friction, and to analyze the frictional work done by air when the actual rise is 2 m short of the calculated height.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of energy conservation principles, specifically the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in the context of the spring's compression and the ball's ascent. There are questions about the validity of the calculated height and the implications of air friction on the actual rise.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the calculations and questioning the assumptions made regarding the problem's parameters. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between work done by non-conservative forces and mechanical energy, indicating a productive direction for further exploration.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern about the extreme values in the problem, which may affect the realism of the scenario. Participants are also considering the implications of air resistance on the results, which introduces additional complexity to the analysis.

reklaws89
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use work and energy to solve the following. A .1 kg ball is placed against a massless spring that has a stretch constant 50,000 N/m and is compressed 2 m. The spring fires the ball straight up. a) How far did the ball rise assuming no friction? b) The ball's actual rise was 2m short of the answer in part A. What was the frictional work done by air?


Homework Equations


1/2ky^2=mg(h+y)


The Attempt at a Solution


I figured out part A to be 102,038 m... which seems outrageous, but the numbers in this problem are also outrageous. I'm really just struggling on how to do B or even attempt it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show some work to get help here. How did you end up with your answer in part a?
 
I used the equation (KE + PEg + PEs)i = (KE + PEg + PEs)f

KEi=0
KEf=0
PEgi=0
PEsf=0

PEsi=1/2ky^2
(y=compression)
PEgf=mg(h+y)
(h=distance traveled)

therefore, 1/2ky^2=mg(h+y)
so 1/2(50,000N/m)(4m)^2=.1kg(9.8m/s^2)(h+2m)
100,000Nm=.98N(h+2m)
102,040m=h+2m
102,038m=h
 
Looks correct, but as you say, the numbers given are outrageous. And if air friction causes the ball to stop 2 feet short of 102,038', that's not even significant enough to bother with. I think the problem just chose a poor set of numbers. But for part B, in general, what do you know about the relationship between work done by non conservative forces, and mechanical energy?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K