Solve (t^2-1)y'' +4ty'+2y=6t, given two particular solutions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation (t^2-1)y'' + 4ty' + 2y = 6t using two particular solutions. One participant expresses confusion about how a linear combination of particular solutions can yield a homogeneous solution, questioning if there's a theorem that supports this concept. Another response clarifies that the differentiation operator acts as a linear map in this context, which helps in deriving the general solution. The necessity of only one particular solution to find the general solution is also highlighted, raising questions about the utility of having two. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding linearity in differential equations to navigate solution strategies effectively.
CGandC
Messages
326
Reaction score
34
Homework Statement
Solve the DE ##\left(t^2-1\right) \ddot{y}+4 t \dot{y}+2 y=6 t ## if its two particular solutions are ## y_1=t ## and ## y_2=\frac{t^2+t+1}{t+1} ##.
Relevant Equations
method of variation of parameters ( possibly utilizing here Wronskian of linear non-homogeneous differential equation of second order order ).
I find a solution in math.exchange site: https://math.stackexchange.com/ques...neral-solution-given-two-particular-solutions

The way I thought about solving the problem is to somehow use the two particular solutions to generate a homogeneous solution, I couldn't figure out how to do so; but, the solutions proposed in the link above leave me with an uneasiness of mind because:

1. The first answer- i.e. that the linear combination of the particular solutions is one fundamental homogenous solution ( in which case, I can use the wronskian to find the other fundamental homogenous solution and then we're finished ) is a little bit tricky because how was I supposed to know that the sum of particular solutions may generate a homogenous solution? is there any theorem backing this?

2. The second answer - i.e. using the substitution ## u = (t+1)x ## will enable me to find the homogenous solution regardless of the given information about two particular solutions ( but i'll need information about one particular solution to generate a general solution ), so how does the knowledge of two particular solutions help me here? ( I only need one )

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CGandC said:
1. The first answer- i.e. that the linear combination of the particular solutions is one fundamental homogenous solution ( in which case, I can use the wronskian to find the other fundamental homogenous solution and then we're finished ) is a little bit tricky because how was I supposed to know that the sum of particular solutions may generate a homogenous solution? is there any theorem backing this?

This is a result from the general theory of linear maps: If \alpha(x) = \alpha(y) = b for linear \alpha then \alpha (x - y) = \alpha(x) - \alpha(y) = b - b = 0.
 
pasmith said:
This is a result from the general theory of linear maps: If \alpha(x) = \alpha(y) = b for linear \alpha then \alpha (x - y) = \alpha(x) - \alpha(y) = b - b = 0.
Ah, I see that now, in our case, the linear map is the differentiation operator over vector space of smooth functions over reals? ( because we wish to find such a smooth general solution )
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top