Solve Tension of Three Strings: Mass 15.0 kg

  • Thread starter Thread starter seuzy13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the tension in three strings supporting a mass of 15.0 kg. The original poster presents a scenario involving a block hanging from strings at different angles, seeking clarity on the nature of tension and the forces acting on the strings.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of tension, questioning why strings A and B pull upwards on string C and the nature of forces in equilibrium. There is an attempt to relate tension to external forces and internal reactions within the strings.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of tension and equilibrium, discussing how forces interact in different scenarios. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between external forces and internal tension, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that the problem is presented in a textbook, which they feel does not adequately explain the concept of tension, leading to their confusion. There is an emphasis on understanding the directional nature of forces and tension in various contexts.

seuzy13
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is no one particular problem, but I will give one that I am struggling to understand as an example:

A block of mass m = 15.0 kg is hanging from three strings. What are the tensions in the strings?

There is a diagram that goes with this problem. There is one string (C) directly connected to the mass and two strings (A, B) connected to the ceiling that meet at the first string (C). String A meets the ceiling at an angle of 30 degrees, string B at 45 degrees.

Homework Equations



m = 15.0kg

The Attempt at a Solution



This is actually an example in the book, so I have the solution in front of me. I understand how the problem is set up, equations, etc. The sole thing I don't understand is why the strings are pulling the directions they are pulling. For instance, why are strings A and B pulling up on C? Don't all three strings have a pull in both directions? Please make this concept of tension clearer for me. The book does a poor job.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tension doesn't have direction until you relate it to one end or another. Imagine pulling a length of string between your two hands. You would say that from your point of view the arrows for the external actions are opposite and outwards. At the left end, say, you have the external force going to the left, equilibrated by an internal force going to the right. So when you isolate (in your mind) one end of the string, you have to replace the 'cut' with any force that might be there - in this case, a tension to the right is needed to keep the external action in equilibrium... OK? At the right end, opposite arrows apply. Hence outward facing arrows for applied force are balanced by internal facing arrows for the internal actions. Stand up. You can feel your weight on the ground. Which way is this force? From the point of view of the ground, the force is downwards, but from the point of view of your feet, it is upwards (and if it wasn't there, you would be drawn to the centre of the earth).
 
pongo38 said:
Tension doesn't have direction until you relate it to one end or another. Imagine pulling a length of string between your two hands. You would say that from your point of view the arrows for the external actions are opposite and outwards. At the left end, say, you have the external force going to the left, equilibrated by an internal force going to the right. So when you isolate (in your mind) one end of the string, you have to replace the 'cut' with any force that might be there - in this case, a tension to the right is needed to keep the external action in equilibrium... OK? At the right end, opposite arrows apply. Hence outward facing arrows for applied force are balanced by internal facing arrows for the internal actions. Stand up. You can feel your weight on the ground. Which way is this force? From the point of view of the ground, the force is downwards, but from the point of view of your feet, it is upwards (and if it wasn't there, you would be drawn to the centre of the earth).

Okay, I had to read this a few times. But I think I get it. You're saying that for every external force on the string, there is an opposite internal force, i. e., tension in the string. But this is only when something is in equilibrium, right?

For instance, there is another example in the book involving a man pulling a crate with a string. The book says "the thin, massless string simply transmits the applied force from one end to the other with no change in direction or magnitude." In this case, is there no opposite internal force in the string as in the first example?
 
Man pulling object with string. Suppose you want to analyse this with a mathematical model. If you want to concentrate on the crate and leave the man out of it and mentally cut the string at (say) its mid-point, you have to replace the cut with the force thus exposed. In other words an arrow representing the force that the man was initiating. This reveals the internal tension in the string. Suppose you want to isolate the man as the free body diagram by cutting the string at its mid-point, then the cut must be replace by a force represented by an arrow going the opposite way to that in the first mathematical model. Bring these two mathematical models into close proximity and you will find the arrows at the cut point are self-equilibrating. If you draw the crate, the string and the man all together, the arrows in the string are by convention drawn pointing towards each other at the ends, representing the string's internal reactions to the applied forces (man pulling, and crate resisting).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K