MHB Solve the BEASTly Trapezoids Puzzle: Find the 4 Heights

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wilmer
  • Start date Start date
Wilmer
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
A circle radius = 725 contains 4 isosceles
trapezoids, length of shorter parallel sides = 666.

Heights, other parallel sides, and equal sides are all integers.

What are the 4 heights?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Wilmer said:
A circle radius = 725 contains 4 isosceles
trapezoids, length of shorter parallel sides = 666.

Heights, other parallel sides, and equal sides are all integers.

What are the 4 heights?
Best to start with a picture.The radius is 725, and AB = 666, so HB = 333 and by Pythagoras OH = 644. Let OK = $x$ and KC = $y$. Then $x^2+y^2=725^2$. So we need to find several ways to express $725^2$ as the sum of two squares. The way to do that is to use the identity $$(a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2) = (ac+bd)(ad-bc) = (ac-bd)(ad+bc).$$ Applying that identity repeatedly to the fact that $$725^2 = 5^4\times 29^2 = (2^2+1^2)(2^2+1^2)(2^2+1^2)(2^2+1^2)(5^2+2^2)(5^2+2^2),$$ you find that $$ 725^2 = 725^2+0^2 = 720^2+85^2 = 715^2+120^2 = 696^2+203^2 = 644^2 + 333^2 = 627^2+364^2 = 580^2+435^2 = 525^2+500^2. $$

To find possible coordinates for the point C = $(x,y)$, we must have $y>333$ and $|x|<644$ (to ensure that AB is the shorter of the parallel sides). We also need BC to be an integer, which (from the triangle BLC) means that $(y-333)^2 + (644-x)^2 = \Box$, where $\Box$ means a square. Since $x^2+y^2 = 725^2$, that relation simplifies to $725^2-644x-333y = \Box.$

Checking through the possible values of $(x,y)$, namely $$ (\pm85,720),\ (\pm120,715),\ (\pm203,696),\ (\pm364,627),\ (\pm435,580),\ (\pm500,525),\ (\pm525,500),\ (\pm580,435),\ (\pm627,364), $$ you can verify that there are exactly four values of $x$ that satisfy $725^2-644x-333y = \Box.$ The corresponding heights are the numbers $644-x.$

The values of $x$ are $\pm525,\ \pm627$, and the heights are 17, 119, 1169, 1271.
 

Attachments

  • trap.png
    trap.png
    4.2 KB · Views: 75
Nope...with your 4, the 2 equal sides AD and BC are not integers.These are my 4 (height, AD/BC, CD, x):
144, 240, 1050, -500
1144, 1160, 1050, 500
280, 406, 1254, -364
1008, 1050, 1254, 364

Using your diagram:
AB = a, CD = b, height HK = h, OK = x, radius = r
I came up with this formula to derive:
r = SQRT(4x^2 + b^2) / 2 where x = (a^2 - b^2 + 4h^2) / (8h)

I don't know why you listed all the triangles you did;
we need triangle 333-644-725 for all cases;
then we need the triangles with a>333:
364-627-725, 435-580-725 and 500-525-725.
That's it, that's all: right?
 
Last edited:
Wilmer said:
Nope...with your 4, the 2 equal sides AD and BC are not integers.These are my 4 (height, AD/BC, CD, x):
144, 240, 1050, -500
1144, 1160, 1050, 500
280, 406, 1254, -364
1008, 1050, 1254, 364

Using your diagram:
AB = a, CD = b, height HK = h, OK = x, radius = r
I came up with this formula to derive:
r = SQRT(4x^2 + b^2) / 2 where x = (a^2 - b^2 + 4h^2) / (8h)

I don't know why you listed all the triangles you did;
we need triangle 333-644-725 for all cases;
then we need the triangles with a>333:
364-627-725, 435-580-725 and 500-525-725.
That's it, that's all: right?
Yes, you are right. My mistake was that I dropped a factor of 2 in the equation $725^2-644x-333y = \Box.$ It should have read $2(725^2-644x-333y) = \Box.$ I then get the values of $x$ to be $\pm364$ and $\pm500$, giving the heights as 144, 280, 1008, 1144.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top