Solve the Puzzling Mystery of the Speeding Plane

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Algr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun Puzzle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a personal anecdote involving the use of a car GPS on an airplane, which reported increasing speeds that appeared to exceed the speed of sound. Participants explore the implications of this observation and the potential for misunderstanding regarding the speed of sound in relation to the airplane's speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recounts their experience with a GPS on a plane, noting that it reported speeds exceeding 790 mph, which is above the speed of sound (767 mph).
  • Another participant suggests that the question posed might be unfair, indicating a possible misunderstanding among readers.
  • There is mention of the speed of sound being affected by temperature, which could complicate the interpretation of the GPS data.
  • A participant proposes that the phrasing of the question could be improved for clarity, specifically regarding the terminology used about breaking the sound barrier.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the fairness of the question and the interpretation of the GPS data. There is no consensus on how to best frame the question or the implications of the reported speeds.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the speed of sound varies with temperature, which may affect the understanding of the situation. There are also indications that the question may have been perceived as a trick, leading to confusion among some readers.

Algr
Messages
940
Reaction score
473
I was debating putting this up in General Physics, but since I already know the answer, I thought I'd put it here. I also put this in some other places to see how different forums would react - my own little experiment.
===========

A true story:
I once took a car GPS with me on an airplane.

It worked! It was fun watching the little box frantically recalculating routes and travel times while the plane happily ignored roads and obstacles. (I turned that part off after a while.) But near the end of the trip, something strange happened.

I started using the GPS about 20 minutes into the flight, and at first, it told me that the plane was moving at about 550 mph. As time passed, the plane's speed slowly and steadily increased - through 600, 700, and as the plane started descending, it reached it's peak of about 790 mph. The speed of sound is just 767 mph, and this ordinary commuter passenger plane was exceeding it! At first I thought that the GPS must be wrong, but then I realized it was quite accurate.

How this was possible? What was really going on?

BTW: The GPS was able to correctly state my altitude. (Or at least was giving me a number that seemed reasonable.)
Edit: Oops, I see there is a brain teasers section. Can this be moved?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's my guess:

The airplane entered the jet stream such that it had a very significant tailwind. Its true airspeed, relative to the atmosphere, was nothing atypical. But its airspeed relative to the ground increased significantly due to the addition of the tailwind speed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yup! Figures that this place would get it first.
 
Someone in another forum got rather angry with me about this. He is sure the question is totally unfair!
 
Algr said:
Someone in another forum got rather angry with me about this. He is sure the question is totally unfair!

He's probably a chemist :-p
 
The speed of sound is just 767 mph
To make it even worse, the speed is lower with lower temperatures ;).
 
So now I am taking flack in that other forum, with two people telling me it was a trick question. Could I have asked it better?
 
the other forum said:
The plane really was going 790 mph. The speed of sound is just 767 mph. Yet plane did not exceed the speed of sound. How is this possible?
I think you should have used 'the plane did not break the sound barrier' instead of 'plane did not exceed the speed of sound.' in the above clarification.

(Note: I can only see the google cache version of the thread from 3 days ago, as it requires a log-in to view the threads.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K