Solve Wave Optics Laser Homework: Find Slit Width w/ Helium-Neon Laser

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around wave optics, specifically focusing on diffraction patterns produced by a single slit and a diffraction grating. The original poster presents a problem involving a helium-neon laser illuminating a single slit and seeks to determine the slit width based on observed minima distances. Another participant introduces a separate problem involving a diffraction grating and the calculation of bright fringes on a screen.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the distances of minima and maxima in diffraction patterns. Questions arise about the correct distances to use in calculations and the implications of the setup for the problems presented.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in clarifying the approach to solving the problems. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculations needed for the slit width and the interpretation of distances in the context of the diffraction grating problem. Multiple interpretations of the problems are being explored, particularly regarding the distances involved in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the distances between minima and maxima, as well as the need to consider the full width of the screen in the context of the diffraction grating problem. Participants are also navigating the assumptions related to the setup of the experiments.

talaroue
Messages
302
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a few questions because of the fact I just don't understand any of this...

1.A helium-neon laser (l=656 nm) illuminates a single slit and is observed on a screen 1.9 m behind the slit. The distance between the first and second minima in the diffraction pattern is 5.45 mm. What is the width (in mm) of the slit?

w=2*(wavelength)*L/a

wavelength= 656 x 10^-9 m
L=1.9 m
a=5.45 x 10^-3 m




The Attempt at a Solution



I plugged and chugged and got 4.574 x 10^-4...what did i do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
5.45 mm is the distance between the first and second minima. How far would it be between the central maximum and the second minimum? That's the distance you need in the equation (as you have it).
 
how do you find that, or how would you appoarch this?
 
The distance from the central max to the first min is the same as the distance from the first min to the second min. You can do the math from here.
 
so is it 22.87 mm?
 
opps I moved the decimal the wrong place .2287 mm
 
Instead of starting a new post I thought that you could just help me on this forum...

A 578 line/mm diffraction grating is illuminated by light of wavelength 599 nm. How many bright fringes are seen on a 2.73-m-wide screen located 3 m behind the grating

L=3 m
Ym=2.73
Lamda= 599 x 10^-9
solving for m?

How do I do this without theata?
 
You have a 2.73 m wide viewing screen. The fringes diffract in both directions from the central "zeroth" order fringe ("bright spot"). There will be two first order fringes, one on each side of the zeroth, two 2nd order fringes, etc.

You don't need theta just as you didn't need theta in the earlier problem. It's the same dang formula used for single slit, double slit, and grating solutions. WHere you had "w" for width of the single slit, you now use the distance between the lines (inverse of # of lines per meter).

We assume that you aim the central "zeroth" max at the center of the viewing screen. Which order will be on the edge(s)?
 
Is it second order then?

This is how I tried solving this...

d= 1/(578x10^-3)
wavelength=599x10^-9
Ym=2.73
L=3
m=? what we are solving for

m=Ym*d/(wavelength*L)
 
  • #10
talaroue said:
Is it second order then?

This is how I tried solving this...

d= 1/(578x10^-3)
wavelength=599x10^-9
Ym=2.73
L=3
m=? what we are solving for

m=Ym*d/(wavelength*L)

Except that the full screen is 2.73m wide. The distance from the central maximum to the "mth" order fringe will be half of that, since there is an mth order fringe to both sides of the center.
 
  • #11
Oh got it, it is starting to make since. Do you always have to divide the distance?
 
  • #12
Not necessarily. You need to remember that the distance involved is from the center of the pattern to the "mth" fringe to either side of the center.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K