Solved: Analysis Question - Show Exists Interval f(x)>0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math_Geek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in real analysis concerning the continuity of a function at a point and the existence of an interval where the function remains positive. The original poster seeks to demonstrate that if a function is continuous at a point and positive at that point, then there exists an interval around that point where the function remains positive.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of continuity and how it relates to the existence of an interval. Some suggest using the epsilon-delta definition of limits to establish the required interval, while others express uncertainty about the implications of the interval containing the point a.

Discussion Status

There is a mix of responses, with some participants providing guidance on using the epsilon-delta definition, while others question the certainty of the interval's properties. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the reasoning behind the existence of the interval.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of ensuring that the interval includes the point a and express concerns about the applicability of the result to intervals outside of this specific range.

Math_Geek
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Analysis Question

Homework Statement


Let f:Reals to Reals be a continuous at x=a, and further suppose f(a)>0. Show there exists an interval I about x=a such that f(x)>0 for all x in I.

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution


i know the defn of continuity but I am not sure how to show this interval exists.
I need HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, this is quite easy to show, just use the definition of the limit, and chose epsylon in such a manner that it will allow you to do this. i.e [tex]0<\epsilon<f(a)-0[/tex].

[tex]\forall\epsilon>0, \ \ also \ \ for 0<\epsilon<f(a),\exists\delta(\epsilon)>0[/tex] such that

[tex]|f(x)-f(a)|<\epsilon, \ \ whenever \ \ 0<|x-a|<\delta[/tex] so from here we have:

[tex]-\epsilon<f(x)-f(a)<\epsilon =>f(a)-\epsilon<f(x)<f(a)+\epsilon[/tex] but look now how we chose our epsilon, [tex]\epsilon<f(a)=>f(a)-\epsilon>0[/tex] so, eventually

[tex]0<f(a)-\epsilon<f(x), \ \ whenever, \ \ \ xE(a-\delta,a+\delta[/tex].

hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
wow thanks
 
Math_Geek said:
wow thanks
Yeah, but make sure next time to show some work of yours!.
 
how do I know it is in the interval around a?
 
Math_Geek said:
how do I know it is in the interval around a?

But notice that x is from the interval [tex](a-\delta,a+\delta)[/tex] which actually includes a. MOreover, it works only for that interval around a, for other intervals we are not sure.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K