Is Linux Too Complicated for the Average User?

  • Thread starter Thread starter damgo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Os
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the complexity of Linux compared to Windows for average users. While some participants argue that Linux offers superior security and stability, others express frustration with its installation process and command-line reliance, which can be daunting for those accustomed to Windows' graphical interface. Windows XP is generally praised for its reliability, while Windows ME is criticized for frequent crashes. Users share experiences with various operating systems, noting that Linux distributions like Red Hat and Debian can simplify installations through package management tools. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the ongoing debate about usability versus flexibility in operating systems.

What OS do you use the most?

  • Windows 2000/XP

    Votes: 31 43.7%
  • Windows 95/98/ME

    Votes: 19 26.8%
  • Linux

    Votes: 12 16.9%
  • Other UNIX

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • MacOS X

    Votes: 8 11.3%
  • Older MacOS

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    71
  • #31
Sorry, what wasn't phrased very well. What i meant was that linux in general doesn't have a package management system. Sure some of the distros do like redhat, slackware, debian, etc but not all of them. For example, I'm pretty sure the floppy version of keeper linux and smoothwall don't have a package managment system. I'm not completely sure, though.
-HBar
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
floppy version of keeper linux and smoothwall don't have a package managment system.

Keeper doesn't, I've never looked through smoothwall, however.

And Hello, since this is my first post. I mainly use XP at the moment, but I have 4 other computers running various things. 3.1 and RedHat are the main other OSs.
 
  • #33
I use XP at school and since I started my job in the physics and mathematics lab, I've used XP ALOT more.

However...

I still have 98 at home and I still find it useful for the tasks I need to perform. So I'll quote the heading of the guitar lessons of Angus of AC/DC in Guitar World magazine: "If it ain't broken, why fix it?"
 
  • #34
My 98 machine is so (in your words) broke. XD The thing crashes every day. I've had it for 3 years, and it's been on for *most* of that time, never having been reinstalled.

The poor thing is ready to blow up, I think. ;)
 
  • #35
Slackware linux. And I've got to say, its awesome. Extremely fast, very customizable and has this festive feel to it.

I've had some major headaches trying to compile and install some programs, but its worth it. And in the end I have one of the most powerful systems in the neighborhood.
 
  • #36
For me it's Solaris 8 (on an old Ultra 5) and that's because I haven't bought any new hardware recently to build a new, faster i386 arch machine. Thus I'm stuck with this for now as my main workstation.

I run Debian as well, but that's on my old 333MHz CPU that works only as the firewall workhorse. I Don't want to bog it down with running X.

<sigh> Ultra 5's framebuffer leaves much to be desired, I'm afraid. I have to run the M64 Graphics Accelerator in 1024x768x60 resolution to keep 24-bit TrueColor. Alas no 1280x1024 for me.

...Unless anyone knows a way around this ...that would be nice :wink:
 
  • #37
I use win 98se for almost every thing and then use Redhat for the rest. Linux needs to be more user friendly. The fact that redhat won't play mp3's out of the box or many games is a problem for them.
 
  • #38
oh, boy. is it that hard to go to the xmms website and download the mp3 plugin.

If your unhappy with redhat, try debian
 
  • #39
Most users won't know how to do that. It's stupid that redhat has that problem. I have debian cds right now. I'm going to use it on my next pc and I also use Knoppix STD
 
  • #40
I use XP, also sometimes when I need, use 98SE.
 
  • #41
Originally posted by Tweek
I use win 98se for almost every thing and then use Redhat for the rest. Linux needs to be more user friendly. The fact that redhat won't play mp3's out of the box or many games is a problem for them.

It isn't stupid. It's a patent issue. From the xmms website:

Redhat 8 shipped without support for mpeg audio due to concerns about patents.

FWIW, Windows doesn't ship with Winamp.
 
  • #42
I like XP. It hasn't crashed. It's pretty stable.

I constantly hear how linux is great etc..etc...it's kinda annoying, but for the average Joe Luser who doesn't care to know what these terms are: patch your kernel, update your rpm's, check your version dependencies. It would be just too much aggravation and frustration on their part to use Linux.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
537
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K