Solvent effect in ambident nucleophiles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the influence of solvent type on the reaction mechanisms of ambident nucleophiles. In polar aprotic solvents, the more electronegative atom of the nucleophile, such as nitrogen in CN-, is free to attack the substrate, favoring SN1 reactions due to the formation of carbocations. However, polar aprotic solvents are typically associated with SN2 reactions. The outcome of the reaction mechanism depends on the specific nucleophile, substrate, and experimental conditions, as both SN1 and SN2 can occur, but the major product is determined by the predominant reaction pathway based on collision theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ambident nucleophiles
  • Knowledge of polar aprotic and protic solvents
  • Familiarity with SN1 and SN2 reaction mechanisms
  • Basic principles of chemical kinetics and collision theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific effects of polar aprotic solvents on SN1 and SN2 mechanisms
  • Study the role of electronegativity in nucleophilic attack
  • Examine examples of ambident nucleophiles in organic reactions
  • Explore experimental methods to determine major products in competing reaction pathways
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and researchers interested in reaction mechanisms and solvent effects in nucleophilic substitutions.

Titan97
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
18
If nucleophile is ambident and solvent is polar aprotic, more electronegative atom is free to attack the substrate.
Since more electronegative atom is a hard base, it forms a stronger bond with hard acids like carbocation. This promotes formation of carbocation by substrate. Hence, SN1 reaction should take place

But, polar aprotic solvent favours SN2 reaction.

So which mechanism does the reaction follow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give the exact nucleophile, substrate, solvent and reaction conditions involved? If it is a technical question, give an example. It would help in making the debate more easier to follow.
 
Example, if CN- was the nucleophile, N is more electronegative. If I used polar protic solvent, Hydrogen bonding will happen with N. So N is hindered and can't act as a good nucleophile.

If the solvent was aprotic, there is nothing to stop N.

Now, (in polar aprotic solvent) N is a hard base and it promotes formation of carbocation (hard base likes hard acids). Then N will attack the carbocation. If carbocation forms, the reaction is SN1. But polar aprotic solvents are generally used for sn2 right?
 
The thing with organic chemistry is this uncertainty. Here is what I know: Every possible reaction happens in every possible case.

What is necessary is which reaction gives the major product. In your case, SN1 may give the major product, but we cannot decide unless the experiment is already performed.

Titan97 said:
But polar aprotic solvents are generally used for sn2 right?

Yes they are. But that doesn't mean other reactions cannot occur. As I said, every possible reaction occurs, but the amount formed could be indeed very tiny. If you are familiar with chemical kinetics, you must know the collision theory of reactions. An organic reaction takes place because of collision between molecules. The molecules can be made to collide anyway possible. And because of the different factors involved (orientation, place of collision, KE of participants,etc), all possible products will form. The major product will be decided based on how majority of the collisions occur.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K