Solving 1D 2-particle/2D 1-particle Schrodinger equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a two-body wave function in one dimension and its extension to two dimensions. The key insight is that the Hamiltonian operator can be separated additively into two Hamiltonians for independent coordinates, allowing simultaneous diagonalization. The eigenstates are expressed as products of eigenstates from each dimension, leading to total energies that are sums of individual energies. The discussion also highlights the introduction of degenerate states and the complexities arising from coupled coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the time-independent Schrödinger equation
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of matrix diagonalization techniques
  • Concept of degenerate states in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the separation of variables in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of commuting operators in quantum systems
  • Explore the implications of degenerate states in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the use of spherical coordinates for central potentials
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers working on multi-particle quantum systems will benefit from this discussion.

El Hombre Invisible
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
Hi

Most of my work in the past has been on 1D independent particle systems where I use matrix diagonalisation to solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation.

How do I go about this for 2D? Or, more accurately, for a two-body wf in 1D? It strikes me as straightforward to construct a Hamiltonian matrix for 2D, but what will that give me when I diagonalise it? Am I going to have to bite the bullet and go to iterative procedures? Please don't make me use a Slater determinant basis! :frown:

Thanks in advance.

El Hombre
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all notice that now you have two position operator [tex]\hat{x},\hat{y}[/tex] and two momentum operators [tex]\hat{p_{x}},\hat{p_{y}}[/tex]
So that operators from different coordinates commute, and a position operator doesn't commute with his conjugate momentum (as excpected).

Usually, in simple systems, your coordinates will be uncoupled, that is, x coordinate is independent of y coordinate. This is the case where you Hamiltonian operator H can be separated additively into two Hamiltonians, each corresponds to another dimension:
[tex]\hat{H}=\hat{H_{x}}+\hat{H_{y}}[/tex]
Due to commutativity properties, those two Hamiltonians commute. Therefore you know that they are both can be diagonalized simultanousley. In a functional form, your eigenstates will be [tex]|i,j>=\phi^{x}_{i}(x)\phi^{y}_{j}(y)[/tex], where i,j are indexing the basis (need not be discrete), and [tex]\phi_{x}[/tex] are eigenstates of [tex]\hat{H_{x}}[/tex] : [tex]\hat{H_{x}}\phi^{x}_{i}=E_{i}\phi^{x}_{i}[/tex]
And the same holds for [tex]\phi_{y}[/tex].
The total energy of each states (which are the eigenvalues of the total Hamiltonian operator) will be [tex]E_{i,j}=E_{i}+E_{j}[/tex] So the angular frequency of the time development will be [tex]w_{i,j}=\frac{E_{i,j}}{\hbar}[/tex]

And each state will be given by [tex]|\psi>=\sum_{i,j}|i,j>e^{-iw_{i,j}t[/tex]

So you can solve simple problems with an harmonic potential in the y direction and a potential well in the x direction, without trouble.

Notice that this introduces a new problem in quantum mechanics: degenerate states. If you have two pairs of [tex](E_{i},E_{j})[/tex] which sums up to the same total energy, then you got yourself two different eigenstates, with the same eigenvalue. This means that now when you measure the energy, the state is projected into a subspace of this energy's eigenstates, but this state is still some superposition of more basic eigenstates which are orthogonal to each other. This is also explored in the notion of "a complete set of commuting operators".

A more complicated case will be when your coordinates are coupled, so the Hamiltonian is not seperable. Then, it really depends on the situation. You can either simply solve the PDE (unlikely), or you can introduce a change of variables which exerts symmetry in the problem (f.e. the analysis of a central potential is better done in spherical coordinates) in which the new variables are uncoupled or introduce simpler equations. Of course you must remember that when coordinates are changed, so does the momentum operators (their change is given by the chain rule if you look at them in position representation)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K