Solving 2^k = n/k for k in Terms of n: Tips and Tricks

  • Thread starter Thread starter flash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation 2k = n/k for k in terms of n, exploring the nature of solutions and methods available.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of finding a closed form solution, with some suggesting that a numerical approximation may be necessary. Others delve into the equivalence of the equation and the potential use of the Lambert W function for a specific transformation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with various interpretations of what constitutes a closed form solution being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the mathematical transformations involved, while others express skepticism about the feasibility of an algebraic solution.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the definitions of "closed form" and "algebraic" solutions, as well as the implications of special cases for n.

flash
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I would like to solve [tex]2^k = \frac{n}{k}[/tex] for k in terms of n, but can't seem to do it. Any help greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hm, there may not be a closed form solution. Does anyone else have better luck?
 
No, you can't solve it algebraically. You can only approximate it numerically, unless n is very special.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that's what I wanted to know. Cheers
 
That depends upon what you mean by "closed form" or "algebraic" solution.

This is obviously equivalent to k2k= n and, since 2k= ekln(2), k ek ln(2)= n. Multiplying on both sides by ln 2, (k ln(2)) ek ln(2)= n ln(2). If we let y= k ln(2), that equation is yey= n ln(2).

That equation is directly solvable by the Lambert W function (which is simply defined as the inverse function to f(x)= xex): k ln(2)= y= W(n ln(2)) so
k= W(n ln(2))/ln(2).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K